It is apparent from all the grounds of the judgment under appeal that the existence of parasitic intent is inferred from a number of findings which concern, on the one hand, the fact that Helena Rubinstein and L’Oréal opted to use in their marks a prefix which reproduces almost all of the earlier mark — a decision which, in the view of the General Court and, before it, the Board of Appeal, (34) cannot be justified by the intention to refer to the botulinum toxin which, moreover, does not form part of the goods covered by the contested marks (35) — and, on the other, the characteristics of the earlier mark, that is to say, its strong distinctive character, owing also to its uniqueness and widespread reputation.
Όταν το έβγαλα, αυτή ήταν η κύρια ιδέα, όπως... η Τζένι κοιμήθηκε με τη Τίνα, που κοιμήθηκε με την ’ ννιEurLex-2 EurLex-2