DT’s line of argument amounts, in essence, to a merger of those two evidentiary options, inasmuch as it requires the Commission to furnish double proof: it would have to establish both that the parent company had actually exercised a decisive influence and that the subsidiary had, in all material aspects, applied instructions from the parent company.
no podemos olvidar quienes somos y de donde venimosEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021