Secondly, as regards the amounts which MEO paid annually to GDA, it is clear from the data set out in the competition authority’s decision of 3 March 2016 to take no further action, the accuracy of which may be verified by the referring court, that those amounts represented a relatively low percentage of the total costs borne by MEO in its service for retail offerings for subscription television access and that the differentiation in tariffs had a limited effect on MEO’s profits in that context.
Esperando a que volvieran a caer los dados, me fui a Venice Beach con seis birras y me tocó el gordo cuando localicé a esta rubiaeurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20