110 On this point, and for reasons similar to those explained in paragraphs 103 to 106 above, which address the contention set out in paragraph 102 above, the Court considers that the applicant lacked credibility when he maintained, in his statement to the Court, that he said in the presence of Mr Laitenberger and Mr Romero Requena that he ‘would go’ or was going to go but only if the resignation was put in writing.
Para eliminar la amenaza de las armas de destrucción masiva es preciso que sea y siga siendo una cuestión de máxima prioridad para los Gobiernos nacionales, las organizaciones regionales y la comunidad internacional en su conjunto.EurLex-2 EurLex-2