By a decision of 3 October 2013, the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam quashed the decision of the first-instance court, holding in particular that, in order to establish whether the economic conditions governing use of the outward processing procedure were satisfied in the present case, it was necessary to determine whether the processing of Community petrol into E85 under the outward processing procedure adversely affected the essential interests, not of Community producers of bioethanol, but those of Community producers of E85.
Mediante sentencia de 3 de octubre de 2013 este último tribunal anuló la sentencia de primera instancia, considerando, en especial, que para determinar si concurrían las condiciones económicas a las que está sujeto el régimen de perfeccionamiento pasivo se debía comprobar si la transformación de gasolina comunitaria en E 85 conforme a ese régimen era perjudicial para los intereses, no de los productores comunitarios de bioetanol, sino de los productores comunitarios de E 85.EurLex-2 EurLex-2