Even if it is regrettable that the contested decision is not very explicit on that point, the Board of Appeal – when finding at paragraph 17 of the contested decision, that, despite the common component ‘rna’, attention would be drawn to, rather, the end of the word, which is more distinctive – did carry out a global analysis of the signs at issue, by concluding that that marked difference allowed for a likelihood of confusion to be ruled out.
Pelaan pelin loppuunEurLex-2 EurLex-2