155 However, that is merely a possibility of which the Commission has made use in certain circumstances, in particular where the infringements form part of a coherent overall strategy (see, to that effect, Cimenteries CBR and Others v Commission, paragraph 154 above, paragraphs 4761 to 4764, and Tetra Pak v Commission, paragraph 154 above, paragraph 236), or where the infringements constitute a single offence (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 100/80 to 103/80 Musique Diffusion française and Others v Commission [1983] ECR 1825, paragraph 127) or where the infringements ascertained in the Commission decision were concerned with the same type of conduct on different markets, in particular the fixing of prices and of quotas and exchange of information, and the undertakings involved in those infringements were, largely, the same (see, to that effect, Case T‐144/89 Cockerill Sambre v Commission [1995] ECR II‐947, paragraph 92).
Ehdotus Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetukseksi valvonnan poistamisesta jäsenvaltioiden rajoilla maantie- ja sisävesiliikenteessä (kodifioitu toisinto) (KOM#- C#-#/#- #/#(CODEurLex-2 EurLex-2