154 Therefore, even though the applicant might personally have been given the impression that the statements of the Deputy Director‐General of DG Human Resources at his hearing were expressed in an accusatory manner, this in itself is not a sign of breach of the rights of the defence or of the principle of the presumption of innocence, especially having regard to the fact that, despite the position adopted by some members in favour of imposing the measure of dismissal, the Disciplinary Committee, by consensus, ultimately recommended a more lenient measure (see, to that effect, judgment in Zavvos v Commission, T‐21/01, EU:T:2002:177, paragraph 336).
Jakautuminen Noin # % rotigotiinistä sitoutuu in vitro plasman proteiineihinEurLex-2 EurLex-2