The Court also established, when interpreting Article 37 of the Treaty, that it cannot be ruled out that a monopoly over the provision of services (in casu `external services' for funerals) may have an indirect influence on trade in goods between Member States (in casu, hearses, coffins, external hangings for the house of the deceased and conveyances for mourners), `in particular where the monopoly over the provision of services established by an undertaking or by a group of undertakings leads to discrimination against imported goods as opposed to products of domestic origin' (see Case 30/87 Bodson v Pompes Funèbres des Régions Libérées [1988] ECR 2479, paragraph 10; see also Case C-17/94 Gervais and Others [1995] ECR I-4353, paragraphs 36 to 38).
jos jonkin jäsenvaltion kiintiöon saavutettu tai jos TAC on kokonaan kalastettu, kalastus on kiellettävä komission päätökselläEurLex-2 EurLex-2