Holcim oor Hongaars
Holcim
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Hongaars
Holcim
39 – See Holcim, paragraph 50, and the case-law cited.
39 – A már hivatkozott Holcim‐ügyben hozott ítélet 50. pontja és az ott hivatkozott ítélkezési gyakorlat.
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
However, the General Court then went on — in paragraphs 110 to 112 of the judgment under appeal — to distinguish the case at hand from those that gave rise to the Holcim case-law.The General Court took the view that,at the time when ASPLA and Armando Álvarez brought their actions in Cases T‐76/06 and T‐78/06, and at the time when they provided a bank guarantee, the breach of the obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time was unforeseeable, and ASPLA and Armando Álvarez could legitimately expect their actions to be dealt with within a reasonable time.
Ezeket a reakciókat az NCI Egységes Toxicitási Kritériumainak (#-as fokozat = G#, #-es fokozat = G#, #-es fokozat = G#) és a COSTART terminológiának megfelelően írták leEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
19 Even assuming the requirement to exhaust domestic legal remedies could be applied to the present case, where there are domestic proceedings seeking payment of interest on the reimbursed anti-dumping duties in addition to the present action before the EU courts seeking compensation for loss suffered by way of bank interest on loans taken out to cover cash losses resulting from the payment of those duties, and irrespective of the judgment of 18 September 2014 in Holcim (Romania) v Commission (T‐317/12, ECR, under appeal, EU:T:2014:782, paragraphs 73 to 77), which placed limits on the situations in which inadmissibility is caused by non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, failure by the applicant to exhaust domestic remedies should, in any event, not be regarded as leading to its action being inadmissible.
Itt az én körömEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The legislation in question, which must be interpreted in accordance with the principles in Bergaderm and Holcim, gives such undertakings the opportunity, at every stage of the procedure up to the consultation of the Advisory Committee, of making known their views on the objections affecting them; (46) furthermore, the legislation requires the Commission to base its incompatibility decisions only on objections on which the parties have been able to give their views. (47)
tekintettel az Európai Globalizációs Alkalmazkodási Alap létrehozásáról szóló, #. december #-i #/#/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendeletre és különösen annak #. cikke bekezdéséreEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Like the General Court, I believe that the Holcim case-law is sound but, unlike the General Court, I do not consider the present case to be substantially different from the cases that gave rise to the judgment in Holcim: to my mind, neither of the two grounds given by the General Court for that distinction is, either taken alone or in combination, convincing.
Akkor a mamád biztosan zseni!Eurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
On balance, the Commission considers that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the acquisition of Cemex West would appreciably increase Holcim’s retaliation potential against suppliers in North Rhine-Westphalia by making any possible coordination easier, more stable or more effective.
Egész délután ott vacakoltEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The European Commission consistently refused (i) to block the stolen allowances, although they each have an individual number and are easily trackable at any time within the EU-ETS and (ii) to disclose in which accounts and/or national registries they are located, with a view to permitting Holcim to institute legal proceedings in the Member State(s) concerned.
Ott lesz Victor temetésénEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers given at its meeting of 26 August 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case M.7054 Cemex / Holcim Assets
És most mit akar csinálni?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
116 The system of rules which the Court of Justice has worked out in relation to the non‐contractual liability of the Community takes into account, inter alia, the complexity of the situations to be regulated, difficulties in the application or interpretation of the legislation and, more particularly, the margin of discretion available to the author of the act in question (Holcim (Deutschland) v Commission, paragraph 50).
Az Európai Parlament #. október #-i jogalkotási állásfoglalása a Közösség legkülső régióiban nyilvántartott halászflották igazgatásáról szóló #/#/EK rendeletet módosító tanácsi rendeletre irányuló javaslatról (COM# – C#-#/# – #/#(CNSEurLex-2 EurLex-2
128 Lastly, in the third place, and in so far as is necessary, it should be recalled that, according to settled case-law, it is not in any event for the Union judicature to usurp the function of the founding authority of the Union in order to change the system of legal remedies and procedures established by the Treaty (see judgment of 21 April 2005 in Holcim (Deutschland) v Commission, T‐28/03, ECR, EU:T:2005:139, paragraph 34 and the case-law cited).
Nem láttad Ickarust?- Nemrég összefutottunkEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The first ground given by the General Court for distinguishing the present case from those which gave rise to the Holcim case-law is that, at the time when Kendrion brought its action in Case T‐54/06, and at the time when it provided a bank guarantee, the breach of the obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time by the General Court was unforeseeable.
Csak eltakarja a meglévo negatív gondolkodástEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
In the alternative, the Commission argues that the General Court erred in law by holding, in paragraph 47 of the order under appeal, that the action for damages before it concerned a dispute relating to individual acts within the meaning of Holcim (Deutschland) v Commission, (6) since it did not in fact involve any individual measure that produced obligations for its addressee.
Tudja, milyen a jó kilépőEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Third ground of appeal: The General Court erred in law by interpreting Article 266 TFEU in the light of the judgments in IPK (2) and Corus (3) and the order in Holcim (4) without taking into account the new regulatory framework applicable to penalties in competition matters.
Mi az, amit én esetleg meg tudnék tenni nektek?Eurlex2019 Eurlex2019
On 23 October 2013, Holcim was given access to non-confidential versions of certain key documents collected during the first phase investigation.
Egy jobb élettel, mert tiéd SofiaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In essence, the General Court accepts the authority devolving from the Holcim case-law but then goes on to distinguish the present case from those which were the object of that case-law.
A #/EGK rendelet #. cikkében említett biztosítékot a hús felhasználása szerinti tagállam intervenciós hivatalánál kell letétbe helyezniEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
52 In order to accept that the condition for the non-contractual liability of the Community relating to the unlawfulness of the conduct of the institutions complained of is satisfied, the case-law requires that a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals is established (Case C‐352/98 P Bergaderm and Goupil v Commission [2000] ECR I‐5291, paragraph 42, and Case C‐282/05 P Holcim (Deutschland) v Commission, paragraph 47).
Ez egy ló, te idiótaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Holcim (Romania) SA, established in Bucharest (Romania) represented by L.
A Bizottság a rendelkezésére álló információ alapján #. június #-án, hat hónappal a bányák Ellinikos Xrysos-nak történő eladása után, a Cassandra Mines eszközeinek értékét az European Golfields megbízásából felbecsülte a Behre Dolbear International Ltd (nemzetközi ásványipari tanácsadó cég), és méltányos piaci árukat # millió EUR-ban állapította megEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Holcim Beteiligungs GmbH (Deutschland) is fully controlled by Holcim Ltd, a joint stock company established under Swiss law, which is the ultimate parent company of the Holcim Group (or ‘Holcim’), a global supplier of cement, aggregates, ready-mix concrete as well as asphalt and cementitious materials with operations in more than 70 countries.
A Bizottság az értesítés kézhezvételét követő két hónapon belül megkérheti az érintett tagállamot vagy szabályozó hatóságot, hogy a mentesség megadásával kapcsolatos döntését módosítsa vagy vonja visszaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
53 As regards the requirement that the breach of Community law must be sufficiently serious, the determining factor in deciding whether it is satisfied is whether the institution concerned manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits of its discretion (Bergaderm and Goupil v Commission, paragraph 43, and Case C‐282/05 P Holcim (Deutschland) v Commission, paragraph 47).
E-#/# (FR) előterjesztette: Alain Cadec (PPE) a Bizottsághoz (#. decemberEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Accordingly, the principles stemming from the Holcim case-law are applicable in the case at hand.
Megkaptad a gyógyszered?Eurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
(Case COMP/M.6195 — Holcim/Basalt/H + B Grondstoffen JV)
Márkajel használata esetén azonban a márkajelhez szorosan kapcsolódóan fel kell tüntetni a „csomagoló és/vagy feladó”-megjelölést (vagy az ennek megfelelő rövidítéstEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Likewise, some Levante region clusters rivals can be considered as closer or equally close alternatives for Cemex’s customers than Holcim.
Az anyámmal járEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Applicant: Holcim (Romania) SA (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: L.
A Bizottság a rendelkezésére álló információ alapján #. június #-án, hat hónappal a bányák Ellinikos Xrysos-nak történő eladása után, a Cassandra Mines eszközeinek értékét az European Golfields megbízásából felbecsülte a Behre Dolbear International Ltd (nemzetközi ásványipari tanácsadó cég), és méltányos piaci árukat # millió EUR-ban állapította megEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 21 April 2005 in Case T-28/03 Holcim (Deutschland) v Commission, dismissing an action for damages which sought to obtain, following the annulment of the Commission's decision imposing a fine in a proceeding under Article 81 EC, the reimbursement of charges in respect of a bank guarantee lodged in order to avoid immediate payment of the fine in question.
Rém cinikus vagy!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
(‘Holcim’, Switzerland) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Aggregate Industries plc (‘AI’, UK) by way of public bid announced on 20 January 2005.
Nem, ez nem igazEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The Commission considers that in Gador-Carboneras cluster, Alicante cluster and Buñol cluster (‘the Levante region clusters’) there are several competitors that can be considered as equally close or even closer alternatives for Holcim’s customers than Cemex.
Mutasd meg a fényeit!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
202 sinne gevind in 9 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.