34 As has already been stated in paragraph 26 above, the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion must, as regards the visual, aural or conceptual similarity of the marks in question, be based on the overall impression which they create, bearing in mind, in particular, their distinctive and dominant components (see Case T‐292/01 Phillips‐Van Heusen v OHIM – Pash Textilvertrieb und Einzelhandel (BASS) [2003] ECR II‐4335, paragraph 47, and CAPIO, paragraph 23 above, paragraph 88 and the case‐law cited; see, by analogy, SABEL, paragraph 24 above, paragraph 23).
Levágom a karotokatEurLex-2 EurLex-2