Moreover, the Commission focuses on those three extracts referred to in recital 349 because, first, they are particularly convincing, and therefore essential, evidence against the applicant showing that it participated in a single and continuous infringement, which was European in scope, second, the applicant did not challenge those statements and, finally, the contemporaneous evidence is particularly strong in inculpating the applicant, without, however, being the only evidence gathered by the Commission.
mivel Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo köztársasági elnök felállította az említett Melo-bizottságot a probléma megvizsgálására, és nemzeti szintű rendőrségi alakulatot rendelt (Usig-alakulat) a gyilkosságok azonnali kivizsgálására és az elkövetők bíróság elé állításáraEurLex-2 EurLex-2