In Linthorst, Pouwels and Scheren, (17) the Court noted that the phrase ‘work on movable tangible property’ calls to mind, in common parlance, purely physical action which is, by nature, in principle neither scientific nor intellectual, and does not include the principal duties of a veterinary surgeon, basically consisting in the treatment of animals in accordance with scientific rules – which, even if it may necessitate physical action on the animal, is not sufficient for it to be described as work.
Talán meg kéne köszönnöm ennek a fickónak, hogy kihozta a koporsót...... a sebezhetetlen templombólEurLex-2 EurLex-2