79 In the second place, the Commission submits that the case-law accords it a discretion which makes it possible for it to choose to whom to address its decision finding that there has been an infringement both in cases of economic succession and, more generally, as regards parent companies and their subsidiaries; it could therefore decide to address the contested decision only to the economic successor, namely Parker ITR, and not to the predecessor still in existence, namely ITR and/or Saiag.
Elektromechanikus szerszámok kézi munkavégzéshez, beépített elektromos motorral, a sövénynyíró gép és pázsitszél nyíró kivételévelEurLex-2 EurLex-2