Supreme Court of the United States
Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat
United States Supreme Court oor Indonesies
United States Supreme Court
en
the highest federal court in the United States; has final appellate jurisdiction and has jurisdiction over all other courts in the nation
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Indonesies
Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
Soortgelyke frases
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
Before long, though, the United States Supreme Court ruled that flag salute was not mandatory.
Mari biarkan ibumu beristirahatjw2019 jw2019
Among the items printed were law briefs for legal cases being taken to the United States Supreme Court.
Bukankah menyenangkan, Scarlett?jw2019 jw2019
p. 40, ¶10, replace last sentence with: In the United States Supreme Court alone, Jehovah’s Witnesses have won 50 victories.
Tapi pencarian tidak mulai weIIjw2019 jw2019
Dean helped draft expansions of the federal criminal law and defended them in cases argued before the United States Supreme Court.
Kenapa kamu tidak masuk, ayah?WikiMatrix WikiMatrix
Texas v. White, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 700 (1869), was a case argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1869.
Panggil kembali merekaWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
The United States Supreme Court Building was completed in 1935; before then, the court held sessions in the Old Senate Chamber of the Capitol.
Kami sedang melakukan OK dengan # lainnyaWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
In 1967, all remaining bans against interracial marriage were judged to be unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia and therefore repealed.
Kau mau lewat?WikiMatrix WikiMatrix
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election.
Polisi mengatakan dia berada di daerah New York sekitar satu minggu, dan mulai menggantung di apartemen selama akhir pekan, bertanya tentang LennonWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
Its controversial history as one of the world's first and largest multinational corporations ended in 1911, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that Standard was an illegal monopoly.
Oh, sialan, kau tak apa- apa..???WikiMatrix WikiMatrix
On October 15, state officials obtained a two-day stay from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which the United States Supreme Court refused to extend on October 17.
Itu?Itu adalah apapun yang menurutmu ituWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
Just 20 years after the family proclamation, the United States Supreme Court authorized same-sex marriage, overturning thousands of years of marriage being limited to a man and a woman.
Kami sangat mencurigai pelarian itu direkayasaLDS LDS
The march was originally intended to be a one-time event, in hopes that the United States Supreme Court would reverse Roe v. Wade immediately a year after its ruling.
Louis, ini barang buktiWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
During the 1940’s the Witnesses gained a series of favorable decisions in the United States Supreme Court, and from ruling powers in some other lands, that upheld freedom of worship.
Dan apa dengan pesta kecil kita?jw2019 jw2019
Wisconsin v. Jonas Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), is the case in which the United States Supreme Court found that Amish children could not be placed under compulsory education past 8th grade.
Kalau begitu aku juga inginWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
In Idaho v. United States (2001), the United States Supreme Court ruled against the state's claim of the submerged lands of the lower third of Lake Coeur d'Alene and related waters of the St. Joe River.
Aku tahu apa yang dilakukan emas dengan jiwa manusiaWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
Among 50 legal victories gained by Jehovah’s Witnesses in the United States Supreme Court have been those guaranteeing the right to declare the good news “publicly and from house to house” and to desist from idolatrous patriotic ceremonies.
Dia menghormati militerjw2019 jw2019
Two United States Supreme Court decisions—Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), which upheld "separate but equal" racial segregation as constitutional doctrine, and Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) which overturned Plessy—serve as milestones.
Aku akan mengawasinya bersamamuWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
For instance, homosexuality in animals was cited by the American Psychiatric Association and other groups in their amici curiae brief to the United States Supreme Court in Lawrence v. Texas, which ultimately struck down the sodomy laws of 14 states.
Apakah kau selalu perhatian seperti ini kepada setiap penumpangmu?WikiMatrix WikiMatrix
The United States Supreme Court decided 7–2 against Scott, finding that neither he nor any other person of African ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States, and therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules.
Aku melantikmu sebagai Presiden ke- # di negara iniWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
The March for Life is an annual rally protesting both the practice and legality of abortion, held in Washington, D.C. on or around the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a landmark decision issued in 1973 by the United States Supreme Court decriminalizing abortion.
Apa yang Anda miliki terhadap mereka?WikiMatrix WikiMatrix
The United States Supreme Court ruling on Edwards v. Aguillard barred the teaching of "Creation Science" in public schools because it breached the separation of church and state, and a group of creationists rebranded Creation Science as "intelligent design" which was presented as a scientific theory rather than as a religious argument.
Banyak sekaliWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court decision that upheld, in a 5–4 ruling, the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy law criminalizing oral and anal sex in private between consenting adults, in this case with respect to homosexual sodomy, though the law did not differentiate between homosexual sodomy and heterosexual sodomy.
Tidak sabar menendang orang RomulanWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948), (also known as the Hollywood Antitrust Case of 1948, the Paramount Case, the Paramount Decision or the Paramount Decree) was a landmark United States Supreme Court antitrust case that decided the fate of movie studios owning their own theatres and holding exclusivity rights on which theatres would show their films.
Sini kita pergiWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
It is noteworthy that an increasing number of state supreme courts in the United States do not accept hypnotically induced testimony.
Ayo, lewat sini!jw2019 jw2019
101 sinne gevind in 21 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.