The Asahi Shimbun pointed out that while in this case the court felt there was insufficient evidence that a contract existed in which both parties agreed that blood would not be used even in a life-endangering situation, the judges disagreed with the lower court on the legality of such contract: “If there is a well-advised agreement between the parties concerned that a blood transfusion should not be given under any circumstances, this Court does not deem it against public order and, hence, invalid.”
Kau tahu, kau menjadi baik menembak dan melakukan seni bela diri, itu semua caramu menanganijw2019 jw2019