213 The Japanese applicants object to that logic, contending, in particular, that, in the present case, the employees of the European producers who made statements as representatives thereof had every interest in ensuring ‘damage limitation’, particularly by admitting the existence of an agreement with the Japanese producers with a view to distracting the Commission’s attention from the true significance of the Fundamental Rules, which sought to share the European markets between European producers, a much more serious infringement.
Vnútroštátne súdy môžu rozhodnúť o neplatnosti alebo platnosti zmlúv a len vnútroštátne súdy môžu priznať náhradz škody fyzickej osobe vo veci porušovania článkov # aEurLex-2 EurLex-2