37 – The phrase ‘objectively and reasonably justified’ (French: ‘objectivement et raisonnablement justifiées’) probably owes its origin to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on Article 14 of the [ECHR], where it is likewise used as the formula for introducing the scheme for examining the legitimate aim and proportionality of a difference in treatment: ‘According to the [European] Court [of Human Rights]’s case-law, a difference of treatment is discriminatory, for the purposes of Article 14 [of the ECHR], if it has no objective and reasonable justification’, that is if it does not pursue a ‘legitimate aim’ or if there is not a ‘reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised’ (Gaygusuz v. Austria, judgment of 16 September 1996, ECHR 1996-IV, p.
37 – Formuleringen ”på ett objektivt och rimligt sätt” (engelska ”objectively and reasonably justified”, franska: ”objectivement et raisonnablement justifiées”) har sitt ursprung i Europeiska domstolens för de mänskliga rättigheterna rättspraxis (Europadomstolen) avseende artikel 14 i Europakonventionen, där den också enbart används som inledning för prövningen av de berättigade målen och proportionaliteten: ”Selon la jurisprudence de la Cour [européenne des Droits de l’Homme], une distinction est discriminatoire au sens de l’article 14 [CEDH] si elle ’manque de justification objective et raisonnable’, c’est-à-dire si elle ne poursuit pas un ’but légitime’ ou s’il n’y a pas de ’rapport raisonnable de proportionnalité entre les moyens employés et le but visé” (Europadomstolens dom i målet Gaygusuz mot Österrike av den 16 september 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-IV, s.EurLex-2 EurLex-2