118 Third, it is settled law that the fact that an undertaking does not abide by the outcome of meetings which have a manifestly anti-competitive purpose is not such as to relieve it of full responsibility for the fact that it participated in the cartel, if it has not publicly distanced itself from what was agreed in the meetings (see, for example, the judgment in Case T-141/89 Tréfileurope Sales v Commission [1995] ECR II-791, paragraph 85).
Tillägget ändrades genom kommissionens förordning (EG) nr #/# i enlighet med artikel #.# i förordning (EG) nrEurLex-2 EurLex-2