Probably, according to what many linguists believe, fully modern language, syntactic language -- subject, verb, object -- that we use to convey complex ideas, like I'm doing now, appeared around that time.
Although the most common order of Turkish transitive sentences is subject–object–verb (SOV), all six permutations are valid (the subject and object are distinguished by case suffixes).
This order is comparable to the non-standard speaking style of Yoda, which is roughly object–subject–verb (e.g., “When nine hundred years old you reach, look as good you will not.").
Word order in Afrikaans follows broadly the same rules as in Dutch: in main clauses, the finite verb appears in "second position" (V2 word order), while subordinate clauses (e.g. content clauses and relative clauses) have subject–object–verb order, with the verb at (or near) the end of the clause.
However, unlike the prefixes of nouns, verbal prefixes are not a fixed part of the verb, but indicate subject, object, tense, aspect, mood and other inflectional categories.
The Danish infinitive may be used as the subject or object of a verb like in English: at rejse er at leve "to travel is to live", jeg elsker at spise kartofler "I love to eat potatoes".
However, because the verb is inflected to indicate the subject and sometimes also the object, this order may be changed to emphasise certain parts of the sentence.
There are two ways of using that kind of IG-verb. The object of the IG-verb can be the subject of the original verb, or the object of the original verb:
知道 今晚?? 发 生 什 么 事? 吗 ?ParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
At this point the sentence is no longer of a verb-object nor subject-object structure, it is purely a declarative sentence/statement, and does not contain any "action".
山姆 , 你? 爲 甚? 麽 要 這樣 做 ?ParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus