It has also been suggested that since the compromis already anticipated the liability of Canada and required the application of both international law and the law of the United States, consequently making it difficult to determine the legal basis of the tribunal’s determination, Trail Smelter “could only be considered of limited relevance as an international legal precedent”.
391还有人提出,事后达成的仲裁协议已经预先考虑了加拿大的赔偿责任,并要求国际法和美国法律同时适用,从而难以确定法庭判决的法律基础,只能认为特雷尔冶炼厂案“是具有有限关联性的国际法律先例”。UN-2 UN-2