/Commissie, C‐313/90, Jurispr. blz. I‐1125, punten 28‐30), met dien verstande dat de positie van de vereniging als onderhandelingspartner duidelijk omschreven en nauw met het onderwerp van de handeling verbonden moet zijn (arrest Hof van 23 mei 2000, Comité d'entreprise de la Société française de production e.a. /Commissie, C‐106/98 P, Jurispr. blz. I‐3659, punt 45).
47 Regarding the role played by the BNS vis-à-vis the Parliament and Commission, it is true that damage to an association’s position as negotiator may, when that association has participated in the procedure leading to the adoption of the contested measure, mean that the specific interests of that association have been affected (see, to that effect, the judgments of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases 67/85, 68/85 and 70/85 Van der Kooy and Others v Commission [1988] ECR 219, paragraphs 21 to 24, and Case C-313/90 CIRFS and Others v Commission [1993] ECR I-1125, paragraphs 28 to 30), although it must also be mentioned that the position as negotiator occupied by the association must be clearly circumscribed and intimately linked to the actual subject-matter of the measure in question (judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-106/98 P Comité d’entreprise de la Société française de production and Others v Commission [2000] ECR I-3659, paragraph 45).EurLex-2 EurLex-2