Metadata
Author: EurLex-2
Data
Bulgarian[bg]
Barnard, EC Employment Law (трето издание, 2006), стp. 321, където авторът се позовава на решението на House of Lords по дело James/Eastleigh Borough Council (1990 г., 3 WLR 55), където се възприема тестът „стига да липсваше“.
Czech[cs]
Barnard, EC Employment Law (3. vydání, 2006), s. 321, v němž se odkazuje na rozhodnutí House of Lords ve věci James v. Eastleigh Borough Council, 1990 3 WLR 55, v níž byl uznán test, který lze vyjádřit slovy „nebýt toho, že“ (v angličtině „but for“).
Danish[da]
Barnard: EC Employment Law (3. udg., 2006), s. 321, der refererer til House of Lords’ afgørelse i James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 3 WLR 55, hvori »but for«-testen blev anerkendt.
German[de]
Aufl., 2006), S. 321, mit Verweis auf die Entscheidung des House of Lords in der Rechtssache James/Eastleigh Borough Council (1990) 3 WLR 55, in der das House of Lords die Betrachtungsweise nach dem Kriterium des einzigen Unterscheidungsmerkmals übernommen hat.
Greek[el]
30 – Βλ., επίσης, Barnard, C., ECEmploymentLaw (3η έκδοση, 2006), σ. 321, που αναφέρεται στην απόφαση του House of Lords στην υπόθεση James κατά Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 3 WLR 55, όπου αναγνωρίστηκε η λυσιτέλεια του κριτηρίου της απουσίας του κρίσιμου χαρακτηριστικού.
English[en]
Barnard, EC Employment Law (3rd edition, 2006), p. 321, referring to the decision of the House of Lords in James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 3 WLR 55, in which it recognised the ‘but for’ test.
Estonian[et]
Employment Law, 3rd edition, 2006, lk 321, kus on viidatud House of Lordsi otsusele kohtuasjas James vs. Eastleigh Borough Council ((1990) 3 WLR 55), kus kohus tunnustas „ainsa eristava omaduse” kriteeriumi.
Finnish[fi]
Eastleigh Borough Council (1990) 3 WLR 55, jossa se hyväksyi ainoaan erottavaan tekijään perustuvan lähestymistavan eli ns. but for -testin.
Hungarian[hu]
Barnard, EC Employment Law (2006., harmadik kiadás) 321. oldal, utalással a Lordok Házának a James kontra Eastleigh Borough Council ügyben hozott ítéletére (1990, 3 WLR 55), amelyben az elismerte a gondolatlehagyásos vizsgálatot.
Italian[it]
Barnard, EC Employment Law (3a edizione, 2006), pag. 321, sulla decisione della House of Lords nella sentenza James/Eastleigh Borough Council (1990) 3 WLR 55, in cui è stato riconosciuto il criterio dell’«elemento distintivo unico».
Lithuanian[lt]
C. Barnard „EC Employment Law“, 3‐asis leidimas, 2006, p. 321, kur nurodytas House of Lords sprendimas byloje JamespriešEastleigh Borough Council [1990] 3 WLR 55, kuriame buvo pripažintas „jeigu ne“ testas.
Polish[pl]
Barnard, EC Employment Law (3rd edition, 2006), s. 321, odnośnie do decyzji Izby Lordów w sprawie James przeciwko Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 3 WLR 55, w której uznany został test „decydującego czynnika”.
Portuguese[pt]
Barnard, CE Employment Law, 3.a edição, 2006, p. 321, referindo a decisão da House of Lords no processo James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 3 WLR 55, onde foi reconhecido o «critério do elemento distintivo único» (‘but for test’).
Romanian[ro]
Barnard, „EC Employment Law” (ediția a 3‐a 2006), p. 321, care se referă la o decizie a House of Lords în cauza James împotriva Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 3 WLR 55, care a adoptat criteriul „factorului determinant” (în limba engleză, „testul «but for»”).
Slovak[sk]
3. vyd. 2006, s. 321, kde sa odkazuje na rozhodnutie Snemovne lordov vo veci James v. Eastleigh Borough Council [1990], 3 WLR 55, v ktorom bol použitý test „určujúceho faktora“ (v angličtine „but for“ test).
Slovenian[sl]
Barnard, EC Employment Law (3. izdaja, 2006), str. 321, ki se sklicuje na sodbo House of Lords v zadevi James proti Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 3 WLR 55, v kateri je bil priznan „če ne“ test.