Metadata
Author: jw2019
Data
Afrikaans[af]
Trouens, die Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, deur McClintock en Strong, kom tot die volgende gevolgtrekking: “Geen gedeelte in die N[uwe] T[estament] kan vertolk word as ’n verbod op die getroude staat van die geestelikes onder die bedeling van die Evangelie nie.”
Arabic[ar]
وفي الواقع تستنتج دائرة معارف المطبوعات الكتابية واللاهوتية والكنسية (بالانكليزية) لواضعَيها مكلنتوك وسترونڠ: «لا يمكن تفسير ايّ نص في العهد الجديد بأنه نهي عن زواج رجال الدين تحت شريعة الانجيل».
Bemba[bem]
Na kuba, icitabo ca Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, icalembwa na McClintock na Strong, cisondwelelo kuti: “Mu Cipingo Cipya tamwaba ifyebo ifilongolo kuti amafunde ye Landwe yalibinda abapatili ukuupa.”
Cebuano[ceb]
Sa pagkatinuod, ang Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, ni McClintock ug Strong, mihinapos: “Walay teksto sa B[ag-ong] T[estamento] nga mahubad nga nagdili batok sa pagminyo sa klero ilalom sa mga balaod sa Ebanghelyo.”
Czech[cs]
McClintockovo a Strongovo dílo Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature z toho usuzuje: „Žádnou pasáž v N[ovém] Z[ákoně] není možné interpretovat v tom smyslu, že podle Evangelia je duchovním zakázáno vstoupit do manželství.“
Danish[da]
The Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature af McClintock og Strong konkluderer: „Ingen passage i Det Nye Testamente kan fortolkes som et forbud mod at gejstlige gifter sig på de vilkår evangelierne angiver.“
German[de]
Das Werk Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature von McClintock und Strong kommt tatsächlich zu folgendem Resümee: „Keine Passage im N[euen] T[estament] kann als ein Eheverbot für Kleriker im Evangeliumszeitalter interpretiert werden.“
Ewe[ee]
Le nyateƒe me la, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, si McClintock kple Strong ŋlɔ la ƒo nya ta be: “Womate ŋu akpɔ nya aɖeke le Nubabla Yeyea me si gɔme woaɖe be efia be wode se ɖe nunɔlawo ƒe srɔ̃ɖeɖe nu le Nyanyuia ƒe ɖoɖo nu o.”
Greek[el]
Στην πραγματικότητα, η Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Βιβλικής, Θεολογικής και Εκκλησιαστικής Φιλολογίας (Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature), των Μακ Κλίντοκ και Στρονγκ, συμπεραίνει: «Κανένα χωρίο στην Κ[αινή] Δ[ιαθήκη] δεν μπορεί να ερμηνευτεί ως απαγόρευση του γάμου των κληρικών υπό το νόμο του Ευαγγελίου».
English[en]
In fact, the Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, by McClintock and Strong, concludes: “No passage in the N[ew] T[estament] can be interpreted into a prohibition against the marriage of the clergy under the Gospel dispensation.”
Spanish[es]
De hecho, la Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, de McClintock y Strong, concluye: “Ningún pasaje del N[uevo] T[estamento] puede interpretarse como una prohibición del casamiento del clero bajo la normativa del Evangelio”.
Estonian[et]
Õigupoolest teeb McClintocki ja Strongi ”Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature” niisuguse järelduse: ”Mitte ühtki kohta U[ues] T[estamendis] ei saa tõlgendada nii, nagu keelaks evangeelne elukorraldus vaimulikel abielluda.”
Finnish[fi]
Eräässä sanakirjassa tehdäänkin seuraava päätelmä: ”Mitään Uuden testamentin osaa ei voida tulkita siten, että evankeliumien maailmankuvan mukaan pappien avioliitot olisi kielletty.” (McClintock ja Strong, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature.)
French[fr]
Plus généralement, comme le note une encyclopédie biblique (Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, par McClintock et Strong), “ aucun passage du N[ouveau] T[estament] ne peut être interprété dans le sens d’une interdiction du mariage pour le clergé sous la loi de l’Évangile ”.
Hindi[hi]
असल में, मक्लिनटॉक और स्ट्रॉन्ग की साइक्लोपीडिया ऑफ बिबलिकल, थिओलॉजिकल, एण्ड एक्लिसिएस्टिकल लिटरेचर यह निष्कर्ष निकालती है: “नये नियम के किसी परिच्छेद का यह अर्थ नहीं निकाला जा सकता कि सुसमाचार विधान में पादरियों के विवाह की मनाही है।”
Hiligaynon[hil]
Sa katunayan, ang Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, ni McClintock kag Strong, nagahinakop: “Wala sing dinalan sa B[ag-ong] T[estamento] ang nagapahangop nga nagadumili ini sa pagpangasawa sang klero sa idalom sang kahimusan sang Ebanghelyo.”
Croatian[hr]
Ustvari, McClintockova i Strongova Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature zaključuje: “Nijedan ulomak iz N[ovog] Z[avjeta] ne može se interpretirati kao zabrana ženidbe svećenstvu u okviru uredbi Evanđelja.”
Hungarian[hu]
A McClintock—Strong-féle Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature valójában ezt a következtetést vonja le: „Az Úsz[Újszövetség] egyetlen passzusát sem lehet úgy magyarázni, hogy az evangéliumi tanácsok alatt lévő papságnak meg lett volna tiltva a házasságkötés.”
Indonesian[id]
Bahkan, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, karya McClintock dan Strong, menyimpulkan, ”Tidak ada ayat dalam P[erjanjian] B[aru] yang dapat ditafsirkan sebagai larangan bagi para pemimpin agama untuk kawin di bawah tata cara Injil.”
Iloko[ilo]
Kinapudnona, kuna ti Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, da McClintock ken Strong: “Awan paset iti B[aro a] T[ulag] a mabalin a maibuksilan a maiparit ti panagasawa dagiti klero babaen iti pangkaaduan a sagudayen dagiti Ebanghelio.”
Italian[it]
Infatti un’opera di consultazione conclude: “Nessun passo del N[uovo] T[estamento] può essere inteso come una proibizione del matrimonio del clero sotto la legge del Vangelo”. — McClintock e Strong, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature.
Georgian[ka]
ფაქტობრივად, მაკ-კლინტოკისა და სტრონგის „ბიბლიური, თეოლოგიური და საეკლესიო ლიტერატურის ენციკლოპედია“ ასკვნის: „ახალ აღთქმაში ვერ მოძებნი ვერც ერთ მუხლს, რომელიც შეიძლება განიმარტოს, როგორც სასულიერო პირებისთვის დაქორწინების აკრძალვა სახარების კანონით“.
Korean[ko]
사실, 매클린톡과 스트롱 공저 「성서와 신학과 교회에 관한 문헌 백과 사전」(Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature)은 이렇게 결론을 맺습니다. “신약 가운데, 복음에 근거하여 교직자의 결혼을 금지하는 것으로 해석할 수 있는 구절은 없다.”
Lithuanian[lt]
Iš tikrųjų Maklintoko ir Strongo enciklopedijoje Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature padaroma išvada: „Jokia N[aujojo] T[estamento] ištrauka negali būti aiškinama kaip evangelijoje duotas nurodymas, draudžiantis dvasininkams tuoktis.“
Latvian[lv]
Maklintoka un Stronga enciklopēdijā Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature izdarīts šāds secinājums: ”Nevienu J[aunās] D[erības] fragmentu nav iespējams interpretēt kā evaņģēliskajam iekārtojumam pakļauto garīdznieku laulību aizliegumu.”
Malagasy[mg]
Raha ny marina, dia nanatsoaka hevitra toy izao ny Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, nataon’i McClintock sy i Strong: “Tsy misy andalan-teny ao amin’ny T[estamenta] V[aovao] azo hazavaina hoe mandrara ny fanambadian’ny klerjy, raha araka ny rafitra napetraky ny Filazantsara.”
Macedonian[mk]
Всушност, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature од Меклинток и Стронг, заклучува: Ниту еден пасус во Н[овиот] З[авет] не може да се протолкува како забрана за брак на свештениците според одредбите на Евангелието“.
Malayalam[ml]
വാസ്തവത്തിൽ, മക്ലിൻടോക്കിന്റെയും സ്ട്രോങ്ങിന്റെയും ബൈബിൾപരവും ദൈവശാസ്ത്രപരവും സഭാപരവുമായ സാഹിത്യ വിജ്ഞാനകോശം (ഇംഗ്ലീഷ്) ഇങ്ങനെ ഉപസംഹരിക്കുന്നു: “സുവിശേഷ നിയമവ്യവസ്ഥ അനുസരിച്ച് പുരോഹിതന്മാരുടെ വിവാഹത്തെ വിലക്കുന്നതെന്നു വ്യാഖ്യാനിക്കാൻ കഴിയുന്ന പാഠഭാഗങ്ങളൊന്നും [പുതിയ നിയമത്തിൽ] ഇല്ല.”
Marathi[mr]
खरे तर, मॅकक्लिंटॉक व स्ट्राँग यांच्या बायबलीय, धर्मशास्त्रीय व धर्मोपदेशकीय वाङ्मयाचा ज्ञानकोश असा निष्कर्ष काढतो: “शुभवर्तमानाच्या व्यवस्थेखाली पाळकाला विवाह करण्यास मनाई आहे, असे नव्या करारातील कोणत्याही उताऱ्याच्या आधारावर म्हणता येणार नाही.”
Norwegian[nb]
McClintock og Strong trekker denne slutningen: «Man kan ikke tolke noen passasjer i NT [Det nye testamente] som et forbud mot at prester gifter seg under den evangeliske ordning.» — Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature.
Dutch[nl]
In feite concludeert de Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, door McClintock en Strong: „Er is geen passage in het N[ieuwe] T[estament] die geïnterpreteerd kan worden als een verbod op het huwelijk van de geestelijkheid onder de Evangeliebedeling.”
Northern Sotho[nso]
Ge e le gabotse, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature e ngwadilwego ke McClintock le Strong, e phetha ka gore: “Ka [Testamenteng e Mpsha] ga go na temana e ka hlaloswago e le e iletšago go nyala ga moruti ka tlase ga taelo ya Boebangedi.”
Nyanja[ny]
Ndiponso, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, yomwe analemba McClintock ndi Strong, inati: “M’Chipangano Chatsopano mulibe mawu alionse omwe angamvedwe ngati kuti ndi lamulo loletsa atsogoleri achipembedzo kukwatira chifukwa cha Uthenga Wabwino.”
Papiamento[pap]
De echo, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, di McClintock i Strong, ta concluí: “No tin ningun pasashi den T[estament] N[obo] cu por ser interpretá bou di mandamentu dje Evangelio como un prohibicion pa clero casa.”
Polish[pl]
W dziele Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature (Encyklopedia literatury biblijnej, teologicznej i kościelnej) pod redakcją McClintocka i Stronga wyciągnięto następujący wniosek: „W żadnym fragmencie N[owego] T[estamentu] nie można się dopatrzyć zakazu zawierania związków małżeńskich przez duchownych, którzy chcieliby podporządkować się rozrządzeniom ewangelii”.
Portuguese[pt]
Aliás, a Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, de McClintock e Strong, conclui: “Não há nenhuma passagem no N[ovo] T[estamento] que possa ser interpretada como uma proibição ao casamento do clero sob a dispensação do Evangelho.”
Romanian[ro]
De fapt, lucrarea Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, de McClintock şi Strong, trage următoarea concluzie: „Nici un pasaj din N[oul] T[estament] nu poate fi interpretat ca fiind o interdicţie a căsătoriei în cazul clericilor aflaţi sub îndrumarea Evangheliei“.
Russian[ru]
В «Энциклопедии библейской, теологической и церковной литературы» Макклинтока и Стронга («Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature») делается такой вывод: «В Н[овом] З[авете] нет ни одного отрывка, который можно было бы истолковать как запрет духовенству под Евангельским законом вступать в брак».
Slovak[sk]
V skutočnosti Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature od McClintocka a Stronga dochádza k záveru: „Žiadnu pasáž v N[ovom] Z[ákone] nemožno interpretovať ako zákaz manželstva pre duchovenstvo v usporiadaní Evanjelia.“
Slovenian[sl]
Dejansko McClintockova in Strongova Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature na koncu sklene: »Nobenega odlomka iz N[ove] Z[aveze] se ne da razlagati kot prepoved, po kateri se duhovništvo pod evangelijsko uredbo ne bi smelo poročati.«
Samoan[sm]
O le mea moni, ua faaiu mai e le Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, a McClintock ma Strong e faapea: “E leai se vaega i le F[eagaiga] F[ou] e mafai ona faaliliuina e faasaina ai le faaipoipo o taʻitaʻi lotu e tusa i mea o faatonuina mai i le Evagelia.”
Shona[sn]
Chaizvoizvo, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, yakanyorwa naMcClintock naStrong, inogumisa kuti: “Hapana ndima muT[estamendi] I[tsva] inogona kutsanangurwa seinorambidza kuroora kwevafundisi vari mugadziriro yeEvhangeri.”
Albanian[sq]
Në fakt, një enciklopedi (Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature) nga Meklintok dhe Strong, nxjerr këtë përfundim: «Asnjë fragment në B[esëlidhjen] e R[e] nuk mund të interpretohet si një ndalim kundër martesës së klerikëve nën rregullimin e Ungjillit.»
Serbian[sr]
U stvari, publikacija Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, od Maklintoka i Stronga, zaključuje: „Prema smernicama iz jevanđelja, u N[ovom] Z[avetu] ne može se protumačiti ni jedan stih koji bi sveštenstvu zabranjivao stupanje u brak.“
Southern Sotho[st]
Ha e le hantle, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, ea McClintock le Strong, e phetha ka ho re: “Ha ho temana ea [Testamente e Ncha] e ka hlalosoang ka hore e thibela moruti ho nyala ka taelo ea Kosepele.”
Swedish[sv]
Uppslagsverket Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature (McClintock och Strong) drar i själva verket följande slutsats: ”Inget ställe i NT [Nya testamentet] kan tolkas som ett förbud mot äktenskap för prästerna under evangelieordningen.”
Swahili[sw]
Kwa kweli, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, ya McClintock na Strong, yafikia mkataa: “Hakuna kifungu katika A[gano] J[ipya] kiwezacho kufasiriwa kuwa katazo dhidi ya ndoa ya kasisi chini ya mgawanyo wa Gospeli.”
Tamil[ta]
உண்மையில், மெக்ளின்டாக், ஸ்ட்ராங் என்பவர்களின் ஸைக்ளோப்பீடியா ஆஃப் பிப்ளிக்கல், தியோலஜிக்கல், அண்ட் எக்லஸியாஸ்டிக்கல் லிட்டரேச்சர் இறுதியாகக் கூறுவதாவது: “பு[திய] ஏ[ற்பாட்டில்] உள்ள எந்தப் பகுதியையும் குறிப்பிட்டு, குருமாரை சுவிசேஷகராக அனுப்பும்போது திருமணத்துக்கு எதிராக அது தடைவிதித்தது என விளக்கம் சொல்ல முடியாது.”
Telugu[te]
వాస్తవానికి, మెక్లింటాక్ మరియు స్ట్రాంగ్లు రచించిన సైక్లోపీడియా ఆఫ్ బిబ్లికల్, థియోలాజికల్, అండ్ ఎక్లిసియాస్టికల్ లిటరేచర్ ఇలా ముగించి చెబుతోంది: “సువార్తను ప్రచారం చేస్తున్న మతనాయకులు వివాహం చేసుకోవడాన్ని నిషేధిస్తున్నట్లుగా, క్రొత్త నిబంధనలోని ఏ వాక్య భాగాన్ని కూడా అర్థం చేసుకోకూడదు.”
Tagalog[tl]
Sa katunayan, ganito ang sabi ng Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, nina McClintock at Strong: “Walang talata sa B[agong] T[ipan] ang maaaring ipakahulugan bilang isang pagbabawal sa pag-aasawa ng klero sa ilalim ng kaayusan ayon sa Ebanghelyo.”
Tswana[tn]
Tota e bile, Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, e e kwadilweng ke McClintock le Strong e konela ka gore: “Ga go na temana epe mo [Tesetamenteng e Ntšha] e go ka bolelwang fa e iletsa baruti go nyala go ya ka thulaganyo ya Efangele.”
Tok Pisin[tpi]
Na wanpela buk (Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, bilong McClintock na Strong) i tok: ‘I no gat wanpela tok long N[upela] T[estamen] ol inap mekim wok long en bilong tambuim ol pris pasto long marit.’
Tahitian[ty]
Oia mau, te horoa mai ra te Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, a McClintock e Strong, i teie mana‘o hopea: “Aita roa ’tu e irava i roto i te F[aufaa] A[pî] e nehenehe e tatarahia ei opaniraa i te faaipoiporaa o te mau upoo faatere haapaoraa ia au i te ture evanelia.”
Ukrainian[uk]
По суті, в «Енциклопедії біблійної, теологічної та церковної літератури» (англ.) Мак-Клінтока й Стронґа пишеться: «Жодна частина Н[ового] З[авіту] не може бути витлумачена, як заборона одруження для членів духівництва, згідно із євангельськими заповідями».
Xhosa[xh]
Phofu, iCyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, ebhalwe nguMcClintock noStrong, ifikelela kwesi sigqibo: “Akukho ndinyana kwi[Testamente Entsha] ekunokuthiwa yalela ukutshata kwabefundisi njengoko bekwinkqubo yokubhedesha iVangeli.”
Yoruba[yo]
Ní gidi, ìwé agbédègbẹ́yọ̀ Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, tí McClintock àti Strong kọ, parí ọ̀rọ̀ sí pé: “Kò sí apá kankan nínú Májẹ̀mú Tuntun tí a lè túmọ̀ sí pé ó ka ìgbéyàwó ẹgbẹ́ àlùfáà léèwọ̀ lábẹ́ ìṣètò Ìhìnrere.”
Zulu[zu]
Empeleni, i-Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, kaMcClintock noStrong, iyaphetha: “Alikho ivesi [eTestamenteni Elisha] elingachazwa njengelinqabela ukushada kwabefundisi ngaphansi kohlelo lweVangeli.”