Metadata
Author: WikiMatrix
Data
English[en]
According to James Nelson, there are three interpretive examinations why Onan's act is condemned: the Onan story reflects firm "procreative" accent of the Hebrew interpretation regarding sexuality, a constant of the "prescientific mind" to consider that the child is contained in the sperm the same way a plant is contained in its seed, and masturbation as well homosexual acts by men have been condemned more strongly than same acts by women in the Judeo-Christian tradition.
Indonesian[id]
Menurut James Nelson, terdapat tiga tinjauan interpretatif mengapa perbuatan Onan dikutuk: kisah Onan mencerminkan karakteristik "prokreatif" yang kuat dalam penafsiran Ibrani terkait seksualitas, suatu pemikiran "pra-ilmiah" yang memandang bahwa anak terkandung di dalam sperma dengan cara yang sama seperti tanaman terkandung di dalam benihnya, dan masturbasi sebagaimana tindakan homoseksual oleh kaum pria dikecam lebih keras daripada tindakan-tindakan serupa oleh kaum wanita dalam tradisi Kristen-Yahudi.