Metadata
Author: EurLex-2
Data
Greek[el]
Η υπόθεση επέστρεψε στο βελγικό Cour constitutionnelle, το οποίο παρέλειψε να ασχοληθεί με το πρόβλημα (βλ. απόφαση 11/2009 της 21ης Ιανουαρίου 2009 και την κριτική ανάλυση των van Elsuwege, P., και Adam, S., «The Limits of Constitutional Dialogue for the Prevention of Reverse Discrimination», European Constitutional Law Review, 5 2009, σ. 327 επ.).
English[en]
The case then returned before the Belgian Constitutional Court, which omitted to deal with the issue (see judgment 11/2009 of 21 January 2009 and the critical analysis by P. van Elsuwege and S. Adam, ‘The Limits of Constitutional Dialogue for the Prevention of Reverse Discrimination’, European Constitutional Law Review, 5 2009, p. 327 et seq.).
Estonian[et]
Kohtuasi läks seejärel tagasi Cour constitutionnelle’ile, kes seda teemat ei puudutanud (vt 21. jaanuari 2009. aasta kohtuotsus 11/2009 ning selle kriitiline analüüs artiklis Van Elsuwege, P. ja Adam, S., „The Limits of Constitutional Dialogue for the Prevention of Reverse Discrimination”, European Constitutional Law Review, 5 2009, lk 327 jj).
French[fr]
Ensuite, l’affaire a été renvoyée à la Cour constitutionnelle (Belgique), qui a omis d’aborder la question (voir arrêt 11/2009, du 21 janvier 2009, et analyse critique de van Elsuwege, P., et Adam, S., «The Limits of Constitutional Dialogue for the Prevention of Reverse Discrimination», European Constitutional Law Review, 5 2009, p. 327 et suiv.).
Portuguese[pt]
° 40). O processo voltou então à Cour constitutionnelle (Bélgica), que não tratou da questão (v. acórdão 11/2009, de 21 de Janeiro de 2009, e a análise crítica de van Elsuwege, P., e Adam, S.,– «The Limits of Constitutional Dialogue for the Prevention of Reverse Discrimination», European Constitutional Law Review, 5 2009, pp. 327 e segs.).
Romanian[ro]
Cauza a fost astfel trimisă înapoi la Cour Constitutionnelle din Belgia, care a omis să analizeze această problemă (a se vedea hotărârea 11/2009 din 21 ianuarie 2009 și analiza critică a lui van Elsuwege, P., și Adam, S., „The Limits of Constitutional Dialogue for the Prevention of Reverse Discrimination”, în European Constitutional Law Review, 5 2009, p. 327 și urm.).
Swedish[sv]
Målet omprövades sedan av den belgiska författningsdomstolen som underlät att pröva frågan (se dom 11/2009 av den 21 januari 2009 och den kritiska analysen av Van Elsuwege, P., och Adam, S., ”The Limits of Constitutional Dialogue for the Prevention of Reverse Discrimination”, European Constitutional Law Review, 5, 2009, sidan 327 och följande sidor).