Federal Supreme Court of Justice oor Bulgaars
Federal Supreme Court of Justice
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Bulgaars
федерален върховен съд
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
In the proceedings before the Court of Justice, the parties to the main proceedings have made reference to a judgment of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court.
координира прилагането от националните референтни лаборатории на методите, посочени в буква а), организирайки сравнителни тестове и по-специално тестове за професионални уменияEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Case-law presented with headlines Federal Supreme Court of Justice: No
Разбери дали знае къде е стаята на МозъкаParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
Federal Supreme Court of Justice: no
Сега и двамата сме свободниParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
the Court of Human Rights? Federal Supreme Court of Justice: no Federal Administrative Court:
Затова мисля, че нито един човек от векове не е страдал така, както ще страдаш тиParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
Daimler Chrysler and CIBS referred to the same judgment and claimed that the Court of Justice and the referring court were bound by the finding of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court that the English judgment was not contrary to public policy because of the debarment.
Заминавам с децатаEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Two of them were attorneys, one was a retired federal judge, and the other was a Supreme Court justice.
Ще ви отрежа ръцетеLiterature Literature
At the hearing, VKI also referred to the judgment of the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice, Germany) of 11 October 2007 (III ZR 63/07), which the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) had itself cited in paragraph 2.20 of its judgment of 11 April 2013 (ECLI:OGH002:2013:0010OB00210.12G.0411.000) in order to confirm that the ‘fiction of acceptance’ (tacit acceptance) cannot extend to substantial contractual changes.
Пребиваш Анджи от годиниEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
Supreme Federal Court of Brazil justices
Знам, че си нямал представаParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
According to the constitution, all constituent states of the federation must have a republican form of government composed of three branches: the executive, represented by a governor and an appointed cabinet, the legislative branch constituted by a unicameral congress and the judiciary, which will include a state Supreme Court of Justice.
Ще ги намерите в заключенията.WikiMatrix WikiMatrix
A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 14 December 2016 from Norges Høyesterett (the Supreme Court of Norway), which was received at the Court Registry on 14 December 2016, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Torbjørn Selstad Thue and the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) v the Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security on the following questions:
Заподозреният избягаeurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
The four dissenting justices argued that stopping the recount was an "unwise" violation of "three venerable rules of judicial restraint", namely respecting the opinions of state supreme courts, cautiously exercising jurisdiction when "another branch of the Federal Government" has a large measure of responsibility to resolve the issue, and avoiding making peremptory conclusions on federal constitutional law prior to a full presentation on the issue.
Не искам да изпитвам това отновоWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
In Case E-19/16, Thorbjørn Selstad Thue supported by the Norwegian Police Federation (Politiets Fellesforbund) v The Norwegian Government — REQUEST to the Court pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett) concerning the interpretation of Article 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Christiansen, and Ása Ólafsdóttir (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 27 November 2017, the operative part of which is as follows:
Трябва да говоря с тебEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
* DK: number of incoming and resolved cases at courts of 1st instance are taken into account; DE: only for the Supreme Federal Court’s budget — as regards courts of 1st and 2nd instance; judicial systems vary between the federal states; EE: number of incoming and resolved cases for courts of 1st and 2nd instance; FR: number of incoming and resolved cases for courts of all instances; IT: the Ministry of Justice defines criteria for civil and criminal courts, while the Council for the Judiciary (CPGA) defines criteria for administrative courts; HU: law states that the salaries of judges must be determined in the act on the central budget in such a way that the amount shall not be lower than it had been in the previous year; NL: the number of resolved cases based on an evaluation of the costs for courts is taken into account.
Ако аз отивам и ти отиваш!eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
15 sinne gevind in 17 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.