Laurens County oor Nederlands

Laurens County

en
Laurens County, South Carolina

Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Nederlands

Laurens County

en
Laurens County, South Carolina
nl
Laurens County (South Carolina)
HeiNER - the Heidelberg Named Entity Resource

Geskatte vertalings

Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings

voorbeelde

wedstryd
woorde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
Hence, far from according an unfair and unjustifiable monopoly to the proprietors of an earlier mark, that regime enables those proprietors to protect and exploit the substantial investment made to promote their earlier mark (judgment of 21 February 2006, Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM — Polo/Lauren (ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB), T‐214/04, EU:T:2006:58, paragraph 43).
In de hoedanigheid van werkend lideurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
That duty has the same effect as that imposed by Article 253 EC (Joined Cases T‐124/02 and T‐156/02 Sunrider v OHIM – Vitakraft-Werke Wührmann and Friesland Brands(VITATASTE and METABALANCE 44) [2004] ECR II‐1149, paragraph 72, and Case T‐214/04 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM – Polo/Lauren (ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB) [2006] ECR II‐239, paragraph 16).
Satellietbeeld van #: # Noord, #: # WestEurLex-2 EurLex-2
104 In putting forward that claim the intervener is making use of the opportunity afforded to it by Article 134(3) of the Rules of Procedure to seek, in its response, a form of order annulling or altering the contested decision on a point not raised in the application (see, to that effect, Case T‐214/04 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM — Polo/Lauren (ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB) [2006] ECR II‐239, paragraph 50, and Case T‐116/06 Oakley v OHIM — Venticinque (O STORE) [2008] ECR II‐2455, paragraph 81).
Dat kan me niet schelenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
116 As regards the intervener’s new claim, submitted at the hearing, that in the event that the contested decisions are annulled, OHIM should be ordered to pay the intervener’s costs, it must be observed that, according to case‐law, it is open to the parties to apply for costs at the hearing, even if they have not previously done so (Case 113/77 NTN Toyo Bearing and Others v Council [1979] ECR 1185, and the Opinion of Advocate General Warner delivered in that case, 1212, 1274; Case T‐214/04 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM – Polo/Lauren (ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB) [2006] ECR II‐0000, paragraph 54).
• Oudergem, Stadium op lijn EEurLex-2 EurLex-2
66 The Court notes that, by its application to dismiss the applicant’s application and to annul the contested decision in so far as it rejected the intervener’s opposition directed against the registration of the mark applied for with regard to the goods in Classes 21 and 24, the intervener is making use of the opportunity afforded to it by Article 134(3) of the Rules of Procedure to seek, in its response, a form of order annulling the contested decision on a point not raised in the application (see, to that effect, Case T‐214/04 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM – Polo/Lauren (ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB) [2006] ECR II‐239, paragraph 50).
Ik weet nog dat ik werkte... als attaché voor UNICEFEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Nuovacome arrivare a Laurens County Health Center, SC
De verwijzing naar artikel #bis in de artikelen # en # van dezelfde gecoördineerde wettenParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
81 By asking the Court to alter the contested decision to the extent that the Board of Appeal upheld the decision of the Cancellation Division rejecting the application for a declaration of the invalidity of the Community trade mark with regard to ‘retail and wholesale services, of eyewear, sunglasses, optical goods and accessories, watches, timepieces, jewellery, decals, posters’, the intervener makes use of the opportunity afforded to it by Article 134(3) of the Rules of Procedure to seek, in its response, a form of order altering the decision of the Board of Appeal on a point not raised in the application (see, to that effect, Case T-214/04 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM – Polo/Lauren (ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB) [2006] ECR II‐239, paragraph 50).
Ik heb wel brokstukken in een elliptische baan gevondenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
7 sinne gevind in 6 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.