superfluous words (in writing) oor Sjinees
superfluous words (in writing)
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Sjinees
冗笔
冗筆
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
“Wo dui ‘Duoyu de hua’ de lijie” [My Interpretation of “Superfluous Words”].
你 看上去 太棒 了 你 看上去... 你 是不是 现在就要生了? 在 就 要 生了?Literature Literature
That wording would render the French proposal superfluous and enable the word “useful” to be retained in the fifth line.
指引? 着 我? 们 , 推?? 着 我? 们 , 是 使命 确? 认 我? 们 的 存在UN-2 UN-2
The sponsors considered the additional words superfluous, but had agreed to their inclusion in the interest of consensus
巨人?? 开 球. 他? 们 防守 西? 侧 向 我的 右方 , 你? 们 的 左方MultiUn MultiUn
The sponsors considered the additional words superfluous, but had agreed to their inclusion in the interest of consensus.
我?? 样 叫 了? 吗 ? 你 有 感? 觉 了 。UN-2 UN-2
Moreover, it was entirely superfluous to insert the word “voluntarily”; such a decision could not but be voluntary
但 一般 來說 對 囚犯 沒有 敬 不敬 禮 這回 事MultiUn MultiUn
Moreover, it was entirely superfluous to insert the word “voluntarily”; such a decision could not but be voluntary.
我? 爱 你? 们-?? 请让 我??? 强 , 我的 主 啊UN-2 UN-2
In the second sentence, the word “all” was superfluous and should be deleted and a hyphen should be inserted between the words “defence” and “related”.
我 該 待在 屋裡 , 讓 他 離開UN-2 UN-2
The Secretariat submits that those words have become superfluous in view of the reformulation of draft articles # and # (see # para
他 是 不會 穿 那些 邋 里 邋遢 的 東西 也 不會 撞 桃花運MultiUn MultiUn
In paragraph # the words “since they are superfluous, given the presence of article # ” should be inserted between the words “unless otherwise agreed” and “but after discussion”
? 闭 上 眼 我 能 看到 Luke 在? 卧 室 你 坐在 窗? 边 的 沙? 发 上MultiUn MultiUn
In draft article 5, the phrase “exercise elements of governmental authority” would be superfluous if the current wording and positioning of draft article 2 were retained.
因?,, 在 有利的 情?,, 你 可以 了解 。 。 。UN-2 UN-2
The view was expressed that these words might be superfluous in the light of the clearly-defined scope of the Model Law
匆忙 打的 包? 不 是 我 第一個 學期MultiUn MultiUn
In paragraph 7, the words “since they are superfluous, given the presence of article 3” should be inserted between the words “unless otherwise agreed” and “but after discussion”.
晚上 好 , 斯 泰 西 晚上 好 ,?? 妈UN-2 UN-2
Sir Michael Wood said that the words “as a whole” were superfluous and should be deleted.
刀? 锋 ,? 让 我 瞧瞧 你 有? 没 有 种UN-2 UN-2
With respect to draft article 8, it was decided that the opening words should be omitted as superfluous.
你? 没 有? 梦 想 ,? 没 有希望 ,? 没 机? 会 受?UN-2 UN-2
With respect to draft article # it was decided that the opening words should be omitted as superfluous
我??? 为 它 藏在?? 缘 体 里.- 他 病的 有 多重?MultiUn MultiUn
It could be argued that these words are superfluous since the present text does not require a written agreement for the parties in order to derogate from the obligation in the provision.
? 这 里 是 白? 杨 市民? 银 行?? 输 入 您的? 个 人?? 号UN-2 UN-2
It could be argued that these words are superfluous since the present text does not require a written agreement for the parties in order to derogate from the obligation in the provision
你 已? 经 假? 装 是 南 波士? 顿 的卡 斯 提 根 了MultiUn MultiUn
On that interpretation, the word “substance” was superfluous, and should be deleted, since it represented a subtle distinction that would be hard to explain to legislators
八? 个 月了 ,? 还 是?? 办 法? 战 胜 病魔? 吗 ?MultiUn MultiUn
On that interpretation, the word “substance” was superfluous, and should be deleted, since it represented a subtle distinction that would be hard to explain to legislators.
? 现 在? 给 我 版 模 并 且 告? 诉 我? 组 合 !UN-2 UN-2
While some support was expressed for the retention of the words between square brackets (“[in light of additional information or a change of circumstances]”), it was widely felt that those words were superfluous
這 裏 的 各位 有沒有 人 願意?MultiUn MultiUn
While some support was expressed for the retention of the words between square brackets (“[in light of additional information or a change of circumstances]”), it was widely felt that those words were superfluous.
? 给 我? 们 一? 个 吻 ,? 汤 尼, 使 我 高? 兴 。 晚安 。UN-2 UN-2
It could, however, be shortened by deleting the words “the use of”, which were superfluous.
袗? 谐 械 薪 褌 小 械? 谢 懈 薪 褵 械 褉 懈 褮 械? 谐 芯? 胁 芯 芯? 写 械 褭 械 褮 械 褋? 褍 薪 邪 屑? 锌 芯 屑 邪? 谐 邪? 谢 懈UN-2 UN-2
In addition, the word “themselves” in that sentence was superfluous and should be deleted. Mr.
不 , 如果 學校 要 開除 我的 話 他們 會 和 你 聯 繫 的UN-2 UN-2
It could, however, be shortened by deleting the words “the use of”, which were superfluous
你 看到 他們 拿走 我 所有 的 照片MultiUn MultiUn
The Working Group may consider deleting these words as being superfluous in the light of the provisions of article # ter (b) and through a cross-reference in article # quater
? 麦 考 利 , 你 就 像 # 年前的 我MultiUn MultiUn
95 sinne gevind in 14 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.