It must be recalled in this respect that goods or services which are complementary are those where there is a close connection between them, in the sense that one is indispensable or important for the use of the other in such a way that consumers may think that the responsibility for the production of those goods or provision of those services lies with the same undertaking (Case T‐169/03 Sergio Rossi v OHIM – Sissi Rossi (SISSI ROSSI) [2005] ECR II‐685, paragraph 60; judgment of 15 March 2006 in Case T‐31/04 Eurodrive Services and Distribution v OHIM – Gómez Frías (euroMASTER), not published in the ECR, paragraph 35; and Case T‐420/03 El Corte Inglés v OHIM – Abril Sánchez and Ricote Saugar (Boomerang TV) [2008] ECR I-0000, paragraph 98).
II‐685, 60 kohta; asia T-31/04, Eurodrive Services and Distribution v. SMHV – Gómez Frías (euroMASTER), tuomio 15.3.2006, 35 kohta, ei julkaistu oikeustapauskokoelmassa ja asia T-420/03, El Corte Inglés v. SMHV – Abril Sánchez ja Ricote Saugar (Boomerang TV), tuomio 17.6.2008, 98 kohta, ei vielä julkaistu oikeustapauskokoelmassa).EurLex-2 EurLex-2