1. Oeuth Ang claimed he had the means to provide Kem Ley with $3,000 because he had sold a parcel of land he had possessed since he was young. However, the prosecutor did not outline any efforts investigators had taken to verify this part of Oeuth Ang’s story, for example locating the land, obtaining any proof of ownership or sale, or interviewing the alleged purchaser to verify that the sale took place.
កំណត់ការលៃតម្រូវពន្លឺឡើងវិញរបស់រូបភាពគោលដៅ នៅទីនេះ & #; ។hrw.org hrw.org