Entrena oor Nederlands
Entrena
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Nederlands
Entrena
Application for figurative Community trade mark including the verbal element ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’
Aanvraag van communautair beeldmerk dat woordbestanddeel „Julián Murúa Entrena” bevat
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
In addition and accessorily, account may be taken of the relative position of the various components within the arrangement of the compound mark (MATRATZEN, paragraph 46 above, paragraph 35; GRUPO SADA, paragraph 69 above, paragraph 49; and Julián Murúa Entrena, paragraph 68 above, paragraph 54).
Dat je in het ziekenhuis lagEurLex-2 EurLex-2
72 It must be considered that, unless shown otherwise, the perception that the relevant public has of the trade mark applied for can be no different from the perception, established by the Tribunal Supremo, that the same public had of the word mark Julián Murúa Entrena.
Ik denk dat ik nog even blijfEurLex-2 EurLex-2
in Case T-40/03: Julián Murúa Entrena v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
Het doel van deze TSI was de technische vooruitgang op het gebied van de veiligheid van tunnels om te zetten in geharmoniseerde en kostenefficiënte maatregelen; deze zouden zoveel als redelijkerwijs mogelijk is in heel Europa identiek moeten zijnEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The applicant therefore rejects the assertion made by the Board of Appeal in paragraph 17 of the contested decision that, when confronted with a verbal element composed of a first name, in this case ‘Julián’, and two surnames, in this case ‘Murúa’ and ‘Entrena’, Spanish consumers tend to disregard the first name and the second surname.
We moeten protest aantekenen tegen de gevolgen van armoede, die onevenredig zwaar weegt op vrouwen.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
63 The applicant also claims that the Board of Appeal was wrong in its view that, in the trade mark applied for, the first surname ‘Murúa’ was the dominant element of the group of words ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’.
Oké, krijg de klereEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Against this background, the Tribunal Supremo ruled that ‘since the word “Murúa” [was] the means of identifying the wines and it [was] this word that [had] led, upon the defendant’s application, to the refusal to register the trade marks “Murúa Gangutia” and “Heredad Murúa Gangutia”, it [was] clear that registration should also [have been] refused, at the administrative stage, in respect of the trade mark “Julián Murúa Entrena” and that it should now, at the judicial stage, be annulled’.
Lijkt me prachtigEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In any event, in so far as those documents related to the claim made by the applicant at the hearing that the Spanish word mark Julián Murúa Entrena and the earlier trade mark coexisted on the Spanish market, the fact remains that the annulment by the Tribunal Supremo of the applicant’s abovementioned word mark, on grounds of a likelihood of confusion on the part of the Spanish public between that trade mark and the earlier trade mark, is enough to show that the alleged ‘peaceful coexistence’ of those trade marks was not a reality.
Ik zal je even helpenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
69 As regards the question whether the relevant public in Spain will generally pay greater attention to the surname ‘Murúa’ than to the surname ‘Entrena’ in the trade mark applied for, the Court considers that, while it is not binding on Community bodies, Spanish case-law can provide a helpful source of guidance.
Ik weet graag wie iedereen isEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In Case T-#/#: Julián Murúa Entrena, residing in Elciego (Spain), represented by I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being Bodegas Murúa SA- action against the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of # December # (Case R #/#-#) relating to opposition proceedings between Bodegas Murúa SA and Julián Murúa Entrena- the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on # July #, in which it
Ik schaam me niet eens om het te zeggenoj4 oj4
15 As far as the visual comparison of the signs is concerned, the applicant points out that the trade mark applied for is a figurative mark comprising, in its upper part, a drawing showing a farmhouse surrounded by trees and vineyards and, in its lower part, a coat of arms surmounted by the words ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’.
Je zou me eens een cake moeten zien bakken!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
The work involves the construction of a by-pass of 4 623 m in length, a T-junction with a waiting lane in the centre to channel traffic turning left to feed onto the current highway and a junction at the point where the by-pass meets the road from Entrena to Lardero; the project will be completed with the construction of a junction with the access road to the A68 motorway at the Logroño junction.
Dat is logica. "EurLex-2 EurLex-2
(Community trade mark – Application for a Community figurative trade mark including the verbal element ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’ – Opposition by the proprietor of the Spanish and international word mark MURÚA – Refusal of registration – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Patronymic)
De heer Jean-Marie Fafchamps, adjunct sociaal bemiddelaar bij het federaal Ministerie van Tewerkstelling en Arbeid, wordt tot ondervoorzitter van de paritaire commissie benoemd. »EurLex-2 EurLex-2
42 Moreover, it should be recalled that consumers of the goods in question usually describe and recognise the goods in question by reference to the verbal element which identifies them (see, to that effect, Case T-40/03 Murúa Entrena v OHIM – Bodegas Murúa (Julián Murúa Entrena) [2005] ECR II-2831, paragraph 56, and judgment of 12 March 2008 in Case T-332/04 Sebirán v OHIM – El Coto de Rioja (Coto d’Arcis), paragraph 38).
Om te voorkomen dat kinderen in het water plassenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
With regard to the importance of the first surname in the present case, it adds that in the past, for the period in which the applicant used the Spanish word mark Julián Murúa Entrena − before that mark was annulled by the judgment of the Tribunal Supremo − it never occurred to the applicant to use his second surname, whereas he employed his first surname on several occasions.
Eli, wat doe je hier?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
85 Moreover, in the present case, the applicant has not put forward any factual or legal consideration, deriving from the national case-law relied upon, which is capable of providing helpful guidance for the determination of the case (see, to that effect, Case T-40/03 Murúa Entrena v OHIM – Bodegas Murúa (Julián Murúa Entrena) [2005] ECR II‐2831, paragraph 69).
Hoe kreeg je ' t?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
For this same reason, it is also very possible, as OHIM claims, that the relevant public will regard the addition, in the trade mark applied for, of the first name and the surname ‘Entrena’ merely as a way to distinguish a range of wines produced by the undertaking that owns the earlier trade mark or, at least, an undertaking economically linked to the intervener.
Eigenlijk...... de heksEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Moreover, the intervener disputes the applicant’s claim that the earlier trade mark coexisted in Spain over a lengthy period with the earlier Spanish word mark of the applicant, Julián Murúa Entrena, which included the same verbal element as the trade mark applied for.
Bestuur voor Ruimtelijke Ordening en Huisvesting (BROHEurLex-2 EurLex-2
71 In that case, in a dispute between the applicant and the intervener, the Tribunal Supremo ruled that the word mark Julián Murúa Entrena, registered in Spain, which covered the same goods as those designated by the trade mark applied for, should be annulled because of the likelihood of confusion, on the part of the Spanish public, with the earlier word mark MURÚA, of which the intervener is the proprietor and on which the opposition before OHIM was also based.
Trombo-embolie (inclusief longembolie en diep-veneuze tromboseEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Figurative mark containing the words ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’ – Word mark MURÚA
En nu dat hokjeEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being Bodegas Murúa SA — action against the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2002 (Case R 599/1999-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Bodegas Murúa SA and Julián Murúa Entrena — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H.
Geef me dan maar ' n aardappelEurLex-2 EurLex-2
That is the case where that component is likely to dominate, by itself, the image of that mark which the relevant public keeps in mind, with the result that all the other components of the mark are negligible within the overall impression created by it (MATRATZEN, paragraph 46 above, paragraph 33, and Case T‐40/03 Murúa Entrena v OHIM – Bodegas Murúa (Julián Murúa Entrena) [2005] ECR II‐2831, paragraph 52).
We spelen niet voor cubitsEurLex-2 EurLex-2
74 Third, while the verbal element of the trade mark applied for indeed differs aurally from the earlier mark through the presence of the first name ‘Julián’ and the surname ‘Entrena’, as the applicant showed at the hearing by way of various examples of wine names, Spanish consumers do not generally say the full name of the wine, but will tend to abbreviate it.
Je andere armEurLex-2 EurLex-2
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2002 (Case R 599/1999-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Bodegas Murúa, SA and Julián Murúa Entrena,
van Margot Keßler (PSE) aan de CommissieEurLex-2 EurLex-2
16 As regards the aural comparison, the applicant observes that the conflicting signs are similar only in the presence of the word ‘Murúa’, the only verbal element in the earlier mark, whereas the trade mark applied for is composed of the first name and surnames ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’.
Het bij die klacht gevoegde voorlopige bewijsmateriaal over dumping van het product en de aanmerkelijke schade als gevolg daarvan werd voldoende geacht om een onderzoek te openenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
55 In the present case, it should be borne in mind that, in paragraph 17 of the contested decision, the Board of Appeal considered that the figurative element of the trade mark applied for, showing a typical farmhouse surrounded by vineyards and trees, had a weak distinctive character for the goods covered by the trade mark applied for and that, as a result, the verbal element of that trade mark, namely ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’, dominated the overall impression created by the sign.
Wat u kreeg, was duidelijk een fragmentEurLex-2 EurLex-2
42 sinne gevind in 8 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.