Drummond Rennie, commented on the lack of quality: “There seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too trivial, no literature citation too biased or too egotistical, no design too warped, no methodology too bungled, no presentation of results too inaccurate, too obscure, and too contradictory, no analysis too self- serving, no argument too circular, no conclusions too trifling or too unjustified, and no grammar and syntax too offensive for a paper to end up in print.”
Drummond Rennie, ay nagkomento sa kakulangan ng mataas na uri: “Tila walang pag-aaral na lubhang pira-piraso, walang palagay na lubhang walang halaga, walang banggit sa literatura na masyadong may-kinikilingan o masyadong makaako, walang disenyo na masyadong pilipit, walang metodolohiyang masyadong padaskul-daskol, walang paghaharap ng mga resulta na lubhang hindi tumpak, napakalabo, at lubhang pasalungat, walang pagsisiyasat na lubhang naglilingkod lamang sa sarili, walang argumentong lubhang sirkular, walang mga konklusyong napakababaw o lubhang hindi makatuwiran, at walang balarila o palaugnayan na kasuklam-suklam upang hindi ilathala ng isang pahayagan.”jw2019 jw2019