Antartica oor Nederlands
Antartica
en
Misspelling of [i]Antarctica[/i].
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Nederlands
Antarctica
en
The area round the South Pole.
nl
Het gebied rond de Zuidpool.
Zuidpoolgebied
en
The area round the South Pole.
nl
Het gebied rond de Zuidpool.
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
// // // The soya-bean oil covered by this description is destined for the preparation of emulsions for injections (a) // 8 maximum ECU 125/100 kg net plus a compensatory amount in certain conditions // ex 1604 11 00 ex 1604 20 10 // Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), for the processing industry for manufacture into pastes or spreads (a) // 0 // ex 1605 10 00 // Crabs of the species 'King' (Paralithodes camchaticus), 'Hanasaki' (Paralithodes brevipes), 'Kegani' (Erimacrus isenbecki), 'Queen' and 'Snow' (Chionoecetes spp.), 'Red' (Geryon quinquedens), 'Rough stone' (Neolithodes asperrimus), Lithodes antartica, 'Mud' (Scylla serrata), 'Blue' (Portunus spp.), simply boiled in water and shelled, whether or not frozen, in immediate packings of a net content of 2 kg or more // 0 // ex 1605 30 00 // Lobster flesh, cooked, for the processing industry for the manufacture of butters based on lobster, or of pastes, pâtes, soups or sauces (a) (c) // 10 // // //
een motor die zodanig uit een motorfamilie is geselecteerd dat hij voldoet aan de voorschriften vande punten # en # van bijlage IEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Thus, the relevant public with regard to whom the assessment of whether unfair advantage has been taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark must be made consists of average consumers of the goods or services for which the later mark is requested (judgment of 12 March 2009 in Antartica v OHIM, C‐320/07 P, EU:C:2009:146, paragraphs 46 to 48).
Toch zie ik ook wel in wat de rapporteur bedoelt, wanneer hij zegt dat dit een zeer moeizame aangelegenheid zou zijn.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
The next step after that is to test it in Antartica and then, if the funding continues and NASA has the resolution to go, we could potentially launch by 2016, and by 2019 we may have the first evidence of life off this planet.
Maar ze zullen veel schade aanrichtented2019 ted2019
The weapons platform in Antartica is incapable of defending the planet against seven Ori ships
Waarom werkt het niet?opensubtitles2 opensubtitles2
Action brought on # February #- Antartica/OHIM
Esmeralda, laat ' m eerst pratenoj4 oj4
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Antartica Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), The Nasdaq Stock Market Inc.
Dit onderzoek dient dan ook te worden verricht door gekwalificeerde onderzoekers onder toezicht van een onafhankelijke instantie of entiteit, teneinde belangenconflicten te vermijdenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Case C-#/# P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of # March #- Antartica Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), The Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. (Appeal- Community trade mark- Regulation (EC) No #/#- Article #- Refusal to register- Earlier trade mark of repute NASDAQ- Figurative sign nasdaq- Use of the earlier mark for goods and services allegedly offered free of charge- Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark- Relevant public
Overigens vertegenwoordigde het advocatenkantoor nog een andere concurrentoj4 oj4
The result now, in our own time, in the opening up of Antartica.”
Deze knuppel isgeen zak waardLiterature Literature
Case T-#/#: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of # May #- Antartica v OHIM- Nasdaq Stock Market (nasdaq) (Community trade mark- Opposition proceedings- Application for Community figurative mark nasdaq- Earlier Community word mark NASDAQ- Relative ground for refusal- Reputation- Article # of Regulation (EC) No
Geneviève HUMBLEToj4 oj4
42 Whether a link between the marks exists must be assessed globally, taking into account all factors relevant to the circumstances of the case, which include the strength of the earlier mark’s reputation and the degree of the earlier mark’s distinctive character, whether inherent or acquired through use (judgments of 27 November 2008, Intel Corporation, C‐252/07, EU:C:2008:655, paragraphs 41, 42 and 53, and 12 March 2009, Antartica v OHIM, C‐320/07 P, not published, EU:C:2009:146, paragraph 45).
Wat is er, schat?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
A cold brown bottle, perhaps Antartica or Brahma, the two brands he'd already sampled in Brazil.
Mag ik voorstellen om over zes maanden de situatie opnieuw te bezien?Literature Literature
It should be pointed out that the various infringements covered by Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94, where they occur, are the consequence of a certain degree of similarity between the earlier and later marks, by virtue of which the relevant section of the public makes a connection between these two marks, that is to say, establishes a link between them even though it does not confuse them (judgment of 12 March 2009 in Case C-320/07 P Antartica v OHIM , not published in the European Court Reports, paragraph 43; order of 30 April 2009 in Case C-136/08 P Japan Tobacco v OHIM , not published in the European Court Reports, paragraph 25; see, by analogy, Case C-252/07 Intel Corporation [2008] ECR I‐8823, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited there).
door de in de punten # en # bedoelde producenten en verantwoordelijke personen alleen in de handel worden gebrachtEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Two men in shirtsleeves and ties shared a table with a large bottle of Antartica between them.
Richtlijn #/#/EU van de CommissieLiterature Literature
Applicant: Antartica Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E.
Ja, ik weet hetEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Case C-#/# P: Appeal brought on # July # by Antartica Srl against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) delivered on # May # in Case T-#/#: Antartica Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs
Niet eerder behandeld gemetastaseerd niercelcarcinoom (MRCC) Er werd een gerandomiseerde, multicenter, internationale fase # studie uitgevoerd waarin de werkzaamheid en veiligheid werden geëvalueerd van sunitinib ten opzichte van IFN-bij patiënten met niet eerder behandeld gemetastaseerd niercelcarcinoomoj4 oj4
Applicant: Antartica S.r.l. (Rome, Italy) [represented by: E. Racca, lawyer]
We hebben al geboekt bij de Arc en Cieloj4 oj4
The existence of such a link in the mind of the relevant public between the mark applied for and the earlier mark is therefore an implied essential precondition for the application of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (see, to that effect, judgments of 10 May 2007, Antartica v OHIM — Nasdaq Stock Market (nasdaq), T‐47/06, not published, EU:T:2007:131, paragraph 53 and the case-law cited, and of 11 December 2014, Coca-Cola v OHIM — Mitico (Master), T‐480/12, EU:T:2014:1062, paragraph 26 and the case-law cited).
We hebben garnalenEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
Appeal brought on 11 July 2007 by Antartica Srl against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 10 May 2007 in Case T-47/06: Antartica Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs)
« #° voor bevordering tot een graad van rang #, voor de ambtenaren van de niveaus B en C van de federale overheidsdienst »EurLex-2 EurLex-2
A further 14 satellites are in production while around half of the total ground installations are being completed around the world (e.g. in Germany, Italy, France, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, New Caledonia, French Guyana, Reunion, and Antartica) in order to support the first launches and commence testing and operations of the launched satellites.
#° een maximale duur hebben van # jaarnot-set not-set
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 10 May 2007 in Case T-47/06 Antartica v OHIM by which that Court dismissed as unfounded an action brought by the applicant for registration of the figurative trade mark ‘nasdaq’ in respect of goods in Classes 9, 12, 14, 25 and 28 against Decision R752/2004-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 December 2005 setting aside the Opposition Division’s decision which rejected the opposition brought by the proprietor of the Community and national word marks ‘NASDAQ’ in respect of goods in Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38 and 42 — Interpretation of Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p.
Ja.De Drazi betalen goed voor beveiligingEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of OHIM of 7 December 2005 (Case R 752/2004-2), relating to opposition proceedings between The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and Antartica Srl.
Iedereen heeft z'n eigen tragische verhaalEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Orders Antartica Srl to pay the costs.
Je mocht best naar de wc, je mocht alleen je handen niet wassenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Thus, the relevant public with regard to whom the assessment of whether any unfair advantage has been taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark must be made consists of average consumers of the goods or services for which the later mark is requested, who are reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect (see, to that effect, judgment of 12 March 2009, Antartica v OHIM, C‐320/07 P, not published, EU:C:2009:146, paragraphs 46 to 48).
In dienst heeft ie hersenletsel opgelopenEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
And it was there, a short distance inland, that the fleet launch pad for this area of Antartica was located.
Artikel # QuorumLiterature Literature
90 sinne gevind in 15 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.