amylum oor Nederlands

amylum

naamwoord
en
starch

Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Nederlands

zetmeel

naamwoordonsydig
GlosbeMT_RnD

Geskatte vertalings

Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings

voorbeelde

Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
The plaintiff states that it did not make a similar declaration to Amylum in respect of 1990.
Zoals je ziet hebben wij wat huwelijkse problemenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
15 Regarding the requests for leave to intervene of the Territorios Históricos of Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa, it must be remembered that an interest in the result of the case for the purposes of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice means a direct, present interest in the grant of the particular form of order sought that the application to intervene is designed to support, and not an interest in relation to the pleas or arguments raised (orders in Case 111/63 Lemmerz-Werke v High Authority [1965] ECR 716, at 717 and 718; Joined Cases 116/77, 124/77 and 143/77 Amylum and Others v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 893, paragraphs 7 and 9; and National Power and PowerGen, paragraph 53).
lk zal met zijn bescherming regeren en ik zal tegenstanders geen genade tonenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
However, referring to the order of the Court of Justice of 12 April 1978 in Joined Cases 116/77, 124/77 and 143/77 Amylum and Others v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 893, the Commission considers that the application to intervene must be dismissed in so far as VDS supports Salt Union' s claim for an order that the Community should indemnify it for the damage allegedly suffered by it.
' Uw vrijgevigheid wordt gewaardeerd. 'EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Being silent in that respect, the judgment of 15 June 1994 should be interpreted as signifying that the matter was finally determined (Case 138/79 Roquette Frères v Council [1980] ECR 3333, paragraph 37; Case 108/81 Amylum v Council [1982] ECR 3107, paragraph 5; Opinion of Advocate General Reischl in the latter case, pp. 3139, 3151 and 3152).
Het bedrijf wou dat we het verzwegen, maar ik wou het goedmaken en de gevolgen onder ogen zienEurLex-2 EurLex-2
However, a submission or argument which may be regarded as amplifying a plea made previously, whether directly or by implication, in the original application, and which is closely connected therewith, will be declared admissible (Case 108/81 Amylum v Council [1982] ECR 3107, paragraph 25; Case 306/81 Verros v Parliament [1983] ECR 1755, paragraph 9; and Case T-216/95 Moles García Ortúzar v Commission [1997] ECR-SC I‐A‐403 and II‐1083, paragraph 87).
Met zijn arrest nr. # van # mei # heeft het Hof het tweede lid van dat artikel vernietigd in zoverre het van toepassing is op de advocatenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Furthermore, the appointing authority was entitled to take a second decision identical to that set aside on grounds of formal defects, provided that it complied with the substantive forms which had originally been infringed (judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 108/81 Amylum v Council [1982] ECR 3107).
Hij zal ook wel een bloemetje voor me hebbenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
15 It is true that the Court has consistently held that the statement of grounds required by Article 190 of the EEC Treaty must disclose in a clear and unequivocal fashion the reasoning followed by the Community authority which adopted the measure in question in such a way as to make the persons concerned aware of the reasons for the measure and thus enable them to defend their rights and the Court to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction ( see paragraph 19 of the judgment of 30 September 1982 in Case 108/81 Amylum v Council (( 1982 )) ECR 3107; paragraph 37 of the judgment of 8 November 1983 in Joined Cases 96 to 102, 104, 105, 108 and 110/82 IAZ and Others v Commission (( 1983 )) ECR 3369; and paragraph 38 of the judgment of 25 October 1984 in Case 185/83 University of Groningen v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen, Groningen (( 1984 )) ECR 3623 ).
Als oud- gezagvoerder bij de marine, beveel ik je het land te verlatenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
AMYLUM IS ALSO CLAIMING THE COST OF THE BANK GUARANTEE REFERRED TO ABOVE AND THE EXPENDITURE IN WHICH IT CLAIMS TO HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN THE DEFENCE OF ITS INTERESTS BEFORE THE BELGIAN AUTHORITIES .
Ik snap dat jullie daar een naar gevoel daarover hebben.Wat?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
89 It follows that, in so far as the Community institutions did not fail completely in the duty of care and proper administration which they owed to the applicant but simply failed properly to appreciate the extent of their obligations under that principle, the breach of the principle of care cannot in this case be regarded as a sufficiently serious breach or a manifest and grave breach, as defined in the case-law of the Court of Justice (see the judgments in HNL, cited above, Joined Cases 116/77 and 124/77 Amylum and Tunnel Refineries v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3497, and in Case 143/77 Koninklijke Scholten-Honig v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3583).
de ontruiming van bovengrondse opslagen en van aanvullingsmaterialen die zich op de site bevinden, alsmede van alle verontreinigde onderliggende grondenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(11) That is also clear from Case 108/81 Amylum v Council, cited by the French Government, in which the Court stated:
Bij brieven van # augustus #, # november #, # februari # en # mei # (respectievelijk geregistreerd op # augustus #, # november #, # maart # en # mei #), heeft de Permanente Vertegenwoordiging van Italië bij de Europese Unie de aanvullende gegevens verstrekt waarom de Italiaanse autoriteiten was verzocht bij brieven van # februari # (ref. AGR #), # oktober # (ref. AGR #), # januari # (ref. AGR #) en # april # (ref. AGREurLex-2 EurLex-2
And in Amylum the Court notes, regarding errors which rendered a Council regulation invalid, that :
Hoe ga jij daarmee om, Peter?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
31 The Commission further states that, even if it were found to be at fault, such fault could not be sufficiently serious for it to incur non-contractual liability, having regard to the content of Articles 38(4) and 43(2) of the Treaty and the case-law of the Court of Justice on the second paragraph of Article 215 of the Treaty (judgments of the Court of Justice in Case 5/71 Zuckerfabrik Schoeppenstedt v Council [1971] ECR 975, Joined Cases 83 and 94/76, 4, 15 and 40/77 Bayerische HNL and Others v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209, Joined Cases 116/77 and 124/77 Amylum v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3497 and Joined Cases C-104/89 and C-37/90 Mulder and Others v Council and Commission [1992] ECR I-3061).
Het is... het is nogal moeilijk uit te leggen aan een leekEurLex-2 EurLex-2
26 – See Article 42(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, and Case 108/81 Amylum v Council [1982] ECR 3107, paragraph 24 et seq.; also – with reference to proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations – my Opinion in Case C‐350/02 Commission v Netherlands [2004] ECR I‐6213, point 31 et seq.
De kandidaturen voor een benoeming in de Rechterlijke Orde moeten bij een ter post aangetekend schrijven aan de heer Minister van Justitie, Directoraat-Generaal Rechterlijke Organisatie, Dienst Personeelszaken, #/P/R.O. II, Waterloolaan #, # Brussel, worden gericht binnen een termijn van één maand na de bekendmaking van de vacature in het Belgisch Staatsblad (artikel # van het Gerechtelijk WetboekEurLex-2 EurLex-2
40 It should in any event be stressed that, as the Court has already held in its judgment in Case 108/81 Amylum v Council [1982] ECR 3107 with regard to the Council Decision of 21 April 1970 on the replacement of financial contributions from Member States by the Communities' own resources (Official Journal, English Special Edition 1970 (I), p. 224), the Decision of 7 May 1985, as a measure of budgetary law, has as its purpose to define own resources allocated to the Community budget and not to specify the Community institutions which are competent to impose duties, taxes, charges, levies or other forms of revenue.
Ik ben van de trap gevallenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
They are not therefore entitled to claim that they had a legitimate expectation that the amount of the aid would be maintained ( see paragraph 6 of the judgment of 1 February 1978 in Case 78/77 Firma Johann Luehrs v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (( 1978 )) ECR 169, and paragraph 13 of the judgment in Amylum, cited above ).
Ik nam haar overal mee uit, deed alles wat ze wilde doenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
According to settled case-law, however, it may exceptionally be otherwise where the purpose to be achieved so demands and where the legitimate expectations of those concerned are duly respected (Racke, 98/78, ECR, EU:C:1979:14, paragraph 20; Amylum v Council, 108/81, ECR, EU:C:1982:322, paragraph 4; and Fédesa and Others, paragraph 58 above, EU:C:1990:391, paragraph 45).
Hij vindt dat deze man met z' n armoedige vakbond te rijk isEurLex-2 EurLex-2
43 In the third and last place, and in any event, it is settled case-law that a submission or argument which may be regarded as amplifying a plea made previously, whether directly or by implication, and which is closely connected therewith, will be declared admissible (judgments of 30 September 1982 in Amylum v Council, 108/81, EU:C:1982:322, paragraph 25, and 14 March 2007 in Aluminium Silicon Mill Products v Council, T‐107/04, EU:T:2007:85, paragraph 60).
Moet je luisteren, schatEurLex-2 EurLex-2
It follows, in the Commission's view, from Amylum that the power of the Court to raise matters of its own motion is limited to questions of admissibility.
Van de vijf heb ik er drie voor m' n ogen zien afknallenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
May it be considered that that illegality is verging on the arbitrary, the conclusion which seems to be demanded by the Court' s judgment in Amylum?
Van South Haven naar Heartland in twee dagenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
91 Referring to the judgment of the Court in Case 108/81 Amylum v Commission [1982] ECR 3107, the Commission stresses that those new pleas raised out of time cannot be deemed to be matters of public policy.
Dat zijn Maya- getallenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Furthermore, the concept of arbitrary conduct as mentioned only in the judgments in Joined Cases 116/77 and 124/77 Amylum v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3497 and in Case 143/77 Koninklijke Scholten-Honig v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3583, the latter of which is referred to by the Commission, does not provide a basis for holding that a finding of conduct verging on the arbitrary represents a necessary condition or formulation for the Community to be rendered liable within the framework of the EEC Treaty according to the abovementioned case-law of the Court of Justice.
Goedenavond dames en heren... en ik gebruik deze term vrijelijkEurLex-2 EurLex-2
13 According to an inspection report drawn up by the competent German authority in December 1992, the plaintiff purchased, between 1 January 1988 and 31 December 1990, 916 925 kg of esterified or etherified starch under CN code 3505 10 50 from the Belgian manufacturer Amylum NV (hereinafter Amylum) and from Cerestar Deutschland GmbH (hereinafter Cerestar), the German distributor of the Netherlands manufacturer Cerestar Benelux BV.
We zijn met ruzie uit elkaar gegaanEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Moreover, with regard to the temporal application of the Community rules, the Court recognized in its judgment in Amylum that
Vlieg merelEurLex-2 EurLex-2
It must enable the reasoning of the Community institution responsible for adopting the measure to be understood clearly and unequivocally so as to enable those concerned to know the reasons for the measure adopted and the Court to exercise its power of review (see the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 108/81 Amylum v Council [1982] ECR 3107).
Wie ben jij dan?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
In respect of 1989, the plaintiff declared to Amylum that the esterified and etherified starches purchased from Amylum are intended for our own use and for the manufacture of end products other than those listed in Annex I to Regulation No 2169/86.
Dus het is een leugendetector?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
62 sinne gevind in 9 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.