197 Por lo tanto, con fundamento en las precedentes consideraciones, puede llegarse a la conclusión de que, en la Decisión impugnada, la Comisión demostró de modo suficiente en Derecho y con arreglo a un análisis de las circunstancias del asunto que los descuentos y pagos por exclusividad concedidos por la demandante a Dell, HP, NEC Lenovo y MSH podían restringir la competencia.
The European Parliament takes the view that the company bodies should be jointly and severally liable for loss and/or damage incurred by the EPC on account of its assets having been depleted, for the benefit of a company body, a member or a person closely associated with one of these, through acts of the company; that the recipient of an unwarranted payment by the company should be responsible for refunding it; that liability should arise only if the act was not in the recognised interests of the EPC; that liability should not arise, in particular, if the EPC is integrated within a group following a consistent policy and any disadvantages are offset by the advantages of its belonging to a group; and that the liability of the executive directors or members under other legal provisions should not be thereby affectedEurLex-2 EurLex-2