37 The Kingdom of Denmark and the Kingdom of Sweden support that argument, pointing out in particular that the reasons which led the Court of Justice in earlier cases (Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau, and Joined Cases C‐514/07 P, C‐528/07 P and C‐532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010] ECR I‐8533), to recognise the existence of a general presumption are not, in the present case, applicable by analogy, having regard, in particular, to the fact that infringement procedures differ as regards the material content, the scope, the sensitivity of the case and the legitimate interest in having details thereof.
Capítulo # " érase una vez...... los nazis ocuparon Francia "EurLex-2 EurLex-2