PepsiCo oor Fins
PepsiCo
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Fins
PepsiCo
By its appeal, the appellant – PepsiCo – claims that the Court should:
Valittajana oleva yhtiö PepsiCo vaatii siinä, että unionin tuomioistuin
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
PepsiCo has failed to demonstrate that the General Court applied the wrong legal criteria.
Saksan on toimitettava komissiolle kahden kuukauden kuluessa # artiklassa tarkoitetun tehostetun tarkkailuohjelman päättymisestä kertomus kyseisen ohjelman tuloksista siihen kuuluvien lajien ja alueiden osaltaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
According to PepsiCo, this emerges particularly clearly from paragraphs 82 and 83 of the judgment under appeal (emphasis added):
Tämä on nykyoloissa talouskriisin vuoksi erittäin tärkeää, mutta sillä on ratkaiseva merkitys myös taloudellisen hyvinvoinnin vallitessa, sillä se on yksi keino parantaa sosiaalista yhteenkuuluvuuttaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Appeal brought on # June # by PepsiCo, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on # March # in Case T-#/#: Grupo Promer Mon Graphic SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), PepsiCo, Inc
ReFactolla ja aiemmin hoidetuilla potilailla tehdyssä kliinisessä tutkimuksessa todettiin inhibiittoreita # potilaalla #: staoj4 oj4
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: PepsiCo, Inc.
Oletko sinä kunnossa?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.#- Pepsico/The Pepsico Bottling Group
Se on labyrinttioj4 oj4
35 PepsiCo claims that the Court should:
Euroopan keskuspankin perusrahoitusoperaation korko: #,# % #. helmikuuta #- Euron kurssiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
9 On 9 September 2003, PepsiCo filed an application for registration of a Community design at OHIM, based on Regulation No 6/2002.
Tule takaisin!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Thus, the qualifier ‘informed’ suggests that, without being a designer or a technical expert, the user knows the various designs which exist in the sector concerned, possesses a certain degree of knowledge with regard to the features which those designs normally include, and, as a result of his interest in the products concerned, shows a relatively high degree of attention when he uses them (judgment of 20 October 2011, PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, C‐281/10 P, EU:C:2011:679, paragraph 59).
tai sen jälkeen käsittely, jolla pH lasketaan alle #:n ja pidetään siinä vähintään tunnin ajan]eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
On 21 September 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Pepsico (USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Regulation control of the whole of The Pepsico Bottling Group (USA) by way of purchase of shares.
A.# Huoltohenkilöstön lupakirjan voimassaolon jatkuminenEurLex-2 EurLex-2
18 By application lodged at the Registry of the General Court on 9 January 2007, Grupo Promer brought an action against the contested decision, claiming that the decision should be annulled and OHIM and PepsiCo ordered to pay the costs.
ETY:n ja Turkin välinen assosiaatiosopimusEurLex-2 EurLex-2
According to PepsiCo, the General Court took, as the relevant public for the purposes of assessing the effect of the designs at issue, not the ‘informed user’ as provided under the Regulation, but the ‘average consumer’ who has to be used as the reference for the purposes of applying the Community trade mark regulation.
Kapteenin virassa, kaikki mikä tapahtuu laivalla on... hänen vastuullaanEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The Board of Appeal therefore annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division and confirmed the validity of the designed registered by PepsiCo.
Koko seitsemänä ja puolena vuotena, jotka olen ollut tämän parlamentin jäsen, minun ei ole tarvinnut antaa henkilökohtaista julkilausumaa.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
- Pepsico France SA (bottler of soft drinks)
Onko sinun pakko olla noin tyly?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
for Pepsico: food and beverage in over # countries
Normi A#.#.# – Valitusmenettely aluksellaoj4 oj4
19 In support of its action, Grupo Promer put forward three pleas in law, alleging, first, bad faith on the part of PepsiCo and a restrictive interpretation of Regulation No 6/2002, second, lack of novelty of the contested design and, third, breach of Article 25(1)(d) of Regulation No 6/2002.
Oletko varma?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
PepsiCo successfully appealed against the decision of the Cancellation Division before the Board of Appeal.
valaisimien ja merkkivalolaitteiden asennuksen osalta säännön N:o # mukaisestiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
– order PepsiCo to pay the costs of the present appeal;
Lukuun ottamatta rokotteita, loisten vastaisia käsittelyjä ja pakollisia taudinhävittämisohjelmia, kun eläimelle tai kasvatuserälle annetaan yli kolme kemiallisesti syntetisoitujen allopaattisten eläinlääkkeiden tai antibioottien avulla suoritettavaa hoitokertaa # kuukaudessa tai useampi kuin yksi hoitokerta, jos eläimen tuotantoelinkaari on alle vuoden mittainen, kyseisiä eläimiä tai niistä peräisin olevia tuotteita ei saa myydä luonnonmukaisina tuotteina, ja eläimiin on sovellettava # artiklan # kohdassa määriteltyjä siirtymävaiheitaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
50 In addition, PepsiCo submits that the informed user will not only consider the ‘most visible surfaces’ of a design and focus on ‘easily perceived’ elements (paragraph 83 of the judgment under appeal), but will have a chance to consider the design as a whole in more detail, and compare it to earlier designs, taking into account the designer’s freedom.
Kantaja esittää kanteensa perusteena kymmenen kanneperustettaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 June 2013 (Case R 1586/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between G-Star Raw CV and PepsiCo, Inc.
Hopkins, menemme sisäänEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Appellant: PepsiCo, Inc., (represented by: E.
Sepä hienoaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
26 As observed by the United Kingdom Government and the European Commission, that interpretation is in keeping with the case-law in which it has been held that, when possible, the informed user will make a direct comparison between the designs at issue (see judgment in PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, C‐281/10 P, EU:C:2011:679, paragraph 55, and Neuman and Others v José Manuel Baena Grupo, C‐101/11 P and C‐102/11 P, EU:C:2012:641, paragraph 54), because that type of comparison actually relates to the impression produced on that user by earlier individualised and defined designs, as opposed to an amalgam of specific features or parts of earlier designs.
Ei, hän häiritsee jo nytEurLex-2 EurLex-2
62 PepsiCo, referring to a recent judgment of the Court concerning plant varieties (Case C‐38/09 P Schräder v CPVO [2010] ECR I‐3209, paragraph 77), submits that the General Court’s minute examination of the differences and similarities between the designs at issue went beyond its task under Article 61(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.
Lähdetään nyt vain kaljalleEurLex-2 EurLex-2
40 In paragraph 53 of its judgment in Case C-281/10 P PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic [2011] ECR I-10153, the Court of Justice stated that the concept of the informed user was to be understood as lying somewhere between that of the average consumer, applicable in trade-mark matters, who need not have any specific knowledge and who, as a rule, makes no direct comparison between the trade marks in conflict, and the sectoral expert, who is an expert with detailed technical expertise.
Tajuatko, ettei vanharouva ole pelkkä koriste suunnitelmassani, vaan sen ydinEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Such a distortion must be obvious from the documents in the file, without there being any need to carry out a new assessment of the facts and the evidence (see, to that effect, judgment of 20 October 2011, PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, C‐281/10 P, EU:C:2011:679, paragraphs 78 and 79).
Ja sitten minä leikkasineurlex-diff-2017 eurlex-diff-2017
(24) The arguments advanced by PepsiCo in that regard fail totally to satisfy those requirements.
En tiennyt, minäEurLex-2 EurLex-2
201 sinne gevind in 5 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.