18 After rejecting, in paragraphs 21 to 25 of the judgment under appeal, a number of pleas as inadmissible because they were new pleas, the General Court held, in paragraph 27 of that judgment, that Mr Fiorucci had put forward in essence two pleas in law, alleging infringement of Article 52(2)(a) and Article 50(1)(c), respectively, of Regulation No 40/94.
Lisäanalyysissä Gardasilin tehokkuutta arvioitiin HPV #: n aiheuttamia CIN #: a ja AIS: ia vastenEurLex-2 EurLex-2