implicit arguments oor Kroaties
implicit arguments
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Kroaties
implicitni argumenti
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
What was implicit in Freud's argument was that the ideal of individual freedom which was at the heart of democracy was impossible.
Ovaj magični marker je ostao bez mastilaOpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
That argument — seemingly an implicit complaint of a distortion of facts — is, however, based on a misunderstanding of the judgment under appeal.
Dobro znaš o čemu pričam.Nosi to sranje vanEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Now that argument, I made that argument 30 -- oh my God, I don't want to think about it — more than 30 years ago, but there's a deeper argument implicit in what I've told you, and I want to tell you that argument briefly, and that is, consciousness creates an observer- independent reality.
Vjerujte mi, Vaše Visočanstvo, nećemo se štedjeti da je vratimo nazadQED QED
49 It must be stated that the reasoning outlined by the General Court in paragraphs 21 to 23 of the judgment under appeal necessarily entails the implicit rejection of the arguments put forward by Donaldson Filtration Deutschland.
Umrla joj je mamaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The strategic interest for an undertaking in a dominant position, such as that formed by DT and ST, in putting forward such arguments based on the concept of implicit refusal is obvious.
Sačekaj trenEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
It cannot be maintained that the judgment under appeal states reasons, even implicit ones, in that regard, which means that the General Court cannot be said to have examined the Commission’s arguments.
Od subote uvečer?Eurlex2019 Eurlex2019
Second ground of appeal, relating to the absence of the advantage allegedly conferred on SACE BT by the second contested measure; breach of Article 107(1) TFEU and misapplication of the PIME test; substantive inaccuracy of the findings of fact, as is apparent from the documents submitted to the General Court; distortion of the argument that SACE SpA actually benefited from an implicit 5/12 increase in the rate of commission received by comparison with that paid by SACE BT to private reinsurers; incorrect categorisation of that argument as an inadmissible ‘new plea in law’.
Koliko sam ti dužan?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
According to settled case-law, the obligation to state reasons does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case, and the reasoning may therefore be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review.
Ima prljavštine ispod nokataEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Consequently, the reasoning may be implicit on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review.
Dobro jutro, SummerEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The reasoning may therefore be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review. (42)
Vama artiljercima je ovdje baš lijepoEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
The reasoning may therefore be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review. (38)
To je moj posao javnog tužiteljaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Consequently, the reasoning may be implicit on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review.
Sada razumiješ kroz šta sam prošla?EuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
Thus, contrary to the appellants’ line of argument as summarised in points 48 and 49 of this Opinion, it is indeed the very concept of ‘implicit refusal of access’ that would cause the most serious conduct to be treated more favourably.
Kakvo ponašanjeEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
The General Court’s reasoning may therefore be implicit on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review. (65)
Uvijek na službi, moj knežeEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
The General Court’s reasoning may therefore be implicit on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review.
Kako je to drvo čvrsto, zar ne?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
(61) Rather the reasoning provided by the General Court may be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review.
Tvoj muz i moja zenaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
74 It is, moreover, settled case-law that the obligation on the General Court to state reasons does not require it to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case and that the Court’s reasoning may therefore be implicit on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review (judgment in Edwin v OHIM, C‐263/09 P, EU:C:2011:452, paragraph 64 and the case-law cited).
I ako ćemo ići u Ojai, mogu ti pokazatiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
12 In that regard, it should be borne in mind that it is clear from established case-law that the obligation to state reasons does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case and its reasoning may therefore be implicit on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review (judgment in Gogos v Commission, C‐583/08 P, EU:C:2010:287, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited).
Znate šta, moja žena je stvarno umorna, prošla je svašta, pa mislim da bi trebalo...... da završimo za danasEurLex-2 EurLex-2
67 In this regard, it should be recalled that, according to settled case-law, the Court of Justice does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case, and that the General Court’s reasoning may therefore be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why it has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review (judgment of 30 May 2018, Tsujimoto v EUIPO, C‐85/16 P and C‐86/16 P, EU:C:2018:349, paragraph 82 and the case-law cited).
Prekratka pričaEurlex2019 Eurlex2019
56 In that regard, it follows from the Court’s settled case-law that the General Court’s duty to state reasons does not require it to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case, and that the General Court’s reasoning may therefore be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why it has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review (judgment of 11 May 2017, Dyson v Commission, C‐44/16 P, EU:C:2017:357, paragraph 38, and the case-law cited).
Otkud ti ovo?eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
48 With regard to the obligation to state reasons on the General Court, it is clear from settled case-law that such an obligation does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case and that the reasoning may therefore be implicit on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review (judgment in Gogos v Commission, C‐583/08 P, EU:C:2010:287, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited).
Ja mislim da je lista zapovijedi bila promišljeno i umjetno uvećana do brojke desetEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The reasoning may therefore be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know why the General Court has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review (see, inter alia, Case C‐439/11 P Ziegler v Commission [2013] ECR, paragraph 82).
Nemoj je odvesti sa sobomEurLex-2 EurLex-2
42 sinne gevind in 10 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.