194 Prolafer, which was not engaged in production during the reference period, argues in that regard that, if the Commission considered the facts cited by the undertaking in question to be relevant, it should a fortiori have taken account of the impact of the event affecting it, that is to say, the imposition of a sequestration order on its plant and equipment as a precaution.
194 Prolafer, die gedurende de referentieperiode niet heeft geproduceerd, verklaart dat de Commissie, indien zij de omstandigheden die door de betrokken onderneming waren aangevoerd, relevant achtte, zeker rekening had moeten houden met de invloed van hetgeen haar is overkomen, namelijk de sekwestratie van de installaties.EurLex-2 EurLex-2