FIFA 08 oor Pools
FIFA 08
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Pools
FIFA 08
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
The games supported included Counter-Strike: Source, Dead or Alive 4, FIFA 08, and Forza Motorsport 2.
Chance, jak ci się wiedzie, wspólnik?WikiMatrix WikiMatrix
Moreover, FIFA submits that the General Court’s reasoning in the judgments in Case T‐385/07 FIFA v Commission and T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission amounts to an unlawful reversal of the burden of proof.
Tak to widzisz?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Moreover, FIFA submits that the General Court’s reasoning in the judgments in Case T-385/07 FIFA v Commission and T-68/08 FIFA v Commission amounts to an unlawful reversal of the burden of proof.
Prezes coś ci mówił?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
26 By order of 15 December 2009, the present case was joined with Case T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission for the purposes of the oral procedure.
Z tego tytułu system finansowania specjalnego programu emerytalnego pracowników RATP stanowił odstępstwo od przepisów prawa powszechnego: RATP było gwarantem równowagi finansowej przedmiotowego programu, ponieważ składka pracodawcy wnoszona przez RATP do programu specjalnego nie miała charakteru uwalniającego od zobowiązańEurLex-2 EurLex-2
By the judgments in Case T‐385/07 FIFA v Commission and Case T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission, the General Court rejected all of the pleas in law raised by FIFA against Decision 2007/479 and Decision 2007/730, respectively.
Hej ty!Lubisz tak tkwić do góry nogami?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
By the judgments in Case T-385/07 FIFA v Commission and Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission, the General Court rejected all of the pleas in law raised by FIFA against Decision 2007/479 and Decision 2007/730, respectively.
Twoje talenty nie są tu w pełni doceniane, AnyankoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The General Court drew appropriate legal conclusions from that finding, in particular in paragraphs 52, 73 to 74 and 114 to 115 of the judgment in Case T‐358/07 FIFA v Commission and in paragraphs 48, 71 to 76 and 112 of the judgment in Case T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission.
Wiadomo już, że Curtis puści focha o to całeEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The General Court drew appropriate legal conclusions from that finding, in particular in paragraphs 52, 73 to 74 and 114 to 115 of the judgment in Case T-358/07 FIFA v Commission and in paragraphs 48, 71 to 76 and 112 of the judgment in Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission.
Jestem detektywemEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Identically, in the light of the interpretation of recital 18 in the preamble to Directive 97/36, the General Court discharged its duty of review and its duty to provide reasons in paragraphs 69 to 72 of the judgment in Case T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission.
Rozciąga się na # gmin departamentu Ardèche w regionie Rhône-AlpesEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Identically, in the light of the interpretation of recital 18 in the preamble to Directive 97/36, the General Court discharged its duty of review and its duty to provide reasons in paragraphs 69 to 72 of the judgment in Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission.
I chciałbym, żeby tak pozostało.Jeśli zmienisz zdanie, tu masz miejsce spotkaniaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In the light of the foregoing, the General Court was correct to confirm the validity, first, of Decision 2007/479 in paragraphs 117 to 119 of the judgment in Case T-385/07 FIFA v Commission, and second, of Decision 2007/730 in paragraphs 160 to 164 of the judgment in Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission.
Ja zostaję tutajEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In the light of the foregoing, the General Court was correct to confirm the validity, first, of Decision 2007/479 in paragraphs 117 to 119 of the judgment in Case T‐385/07 FIFA v Commission, and second, of Decision 2007/730 in paragraphs 160 to 164 of the judgment in Case T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission.
Ma chłodzoną wędzarnię, a w niej ze sto gęsiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Second, I note that, in paragraph 133 of the judgment in Case T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission, the General Court fully responded to FIFA’s arguments relating to the Commission’s failure to take into account the fact that other Member States included mainly ‘prime’ World Cup matches in their national lists.
Jesteś pewna?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Second, I note that, in paragraph 133 of the judgment in Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission, the General Court fully responded to FIFA’s arguments relating to the Commission’s failure to take into account the fact that other Member States included mainly ‘prime’ World Cup matches in their national lists.
Jasne że nieEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In the judgments in Case T-385/07 FIFA v Commission and Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission, the General Court correctly applied Article 3a of Directive 89/552 as amended, finding that the Member States have significant freedom of action in drawing up the national lists, so that the power of review entrusted to the Commission under Article 3a of Directive 89/552 as amended is of a limited nature.
Nazywa się legowiskoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In the judgments in Case T‐385/07 FIFA v Commission and Case T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission, the General Court correctly applied Article 3a of Directive 89/552 as amended, finding that the Member States have significant freedom of action in drawing up the national lists, so that the power of review entrusted to the Commission under Article 3a of Directive 89/552 as amended is of a limited nature.
Formować linię chłopcy!Formować linię!EurLex-2 EurLex-2
In any event, the complaint concerning the alleged contradictory reasoning, illustrated by various extracts taken from the judgments in Case T‐385/07 FIFA v Commission and T‐68/08 FIFA v Commission and isolated from their context, must be found to be ineffective, since those judgments set out to the requisite legal standard the reasons which led the General Court to find that the Commission correctly fulfilled its duty of review under Article 3a of Directive 89/552 as amended.
To nie tylko brak łącznościEurLex-2 EurLex-2
64 sinne gevind in 13 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.