registered user of a trade-mark oor Spaans
registered user of a trade-mark
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Spaans
usuario registrado
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
TRANSOCEAN IS PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS AND EACH MEMBER SHALL REGISTER AS A USER IN HIS RESPECTIVE TERRITORY ( ARTICLE 7 ).
Cuando lo haces todo el día, es tu hombro el que te acaba matandoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in registering an EU trade mark, it is appropriate to lay down a regime of optional EU and national trade mark searches that should be flexible in terms of user needs and preferences.
Gracias.No le gustó vivir cerca de la cuidad?eurlex-diff-2017 eurlex-diff-2017
(29) In order to avoid unnecessary delays in registering an EU trade mark, it is appropriate to lay down a regime of optional EU and national trade mark searches that should be flexible in terms of user needs and preferences.
Chaydez conoce la existencia del cementerio de su primo...... le ayuda a sepultar los cadáveres... y le pasa la historia a Otilio para la canciónnot-set not-set
Article 12(2)(a) of the First Directive 89/104 relating to trade marks, which provides that the proprietor of a trade mark may have its rights revoked if the mark has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered, should be interpreted as meaning that, in cases where intermediaries participate in the distribution to the consumer or the end user of a product which is the subject of a registered trade mark, the relevant classes of persons whose views fall to be taken into account in determining whether that trade mark has become the common name in the trade for the product in question comprise all consumers and end users and, depending on the features of the market concerned, all those in the trade who deal with that product commercially.
Bueno voy a hacer algun control de los daños, por si acasoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Article #(a) of First Council Directive #/#/EEC of # December # to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that in cases where intermediaries participate in the distribution to the consumer or the end user of a product which is the subject of a registered trade mark, the relevant classes of persons whose views fall to be taken into account in determining whether that trade mark has become the common name in the trade for the product in question comprise all consumers and end users and, depending on the features of the market concerned, all those in the trade who deal with that product commercially
de Margot Keßler (PSE) a la Comisiónoj4 oj4
Article 12(2)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that in cases where intermediaries participate in the distribution to the consumer or the end user of a product which is the subject of a registered trade mark, the relevant classes of persons whose views fall to be taken into account in determining whether that trade mark has become the common name in the trade for the product in question comprise all consumers and end users and, depending on the features of the market concerned, all those in the trade who deal with that product commercially.
Lamento estropearles la fiesta...... pero tenemos que discutir un cambio de planes.- ¿ Cuál cambio?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
(29)Ö In order to avoid unnecessary delays in registering an EU trade mark, Õ it is appropriate to Ö lay down a Õ regime of Ö optional Õ EU and national trade mark searches Ö that should be Õ flexible in terms of user needs and preferences.
Météo-France: recopilación y distribución de información meteorológica y climática, francesa y europeaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
– whether the advertiser is in fact offering goods or services which are identical to the goods or services covered by the registered trade mark on a webpage of his own, which internet users ... can access via a hyperlink in the reference on the search engine provider’s webpage?
¿ Estás bien?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
17 By its first question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 12(2)(a) of Directive 2008/95 is to be interpreted as meaning that a trade mark is liable to revocation in respect of a product for which it is registered if, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, that trade mark has become the common name for that product from the point of view solely of end users of the product.
Alguien las insertó digitalmente en las fotosEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(5) Where a trader operating an electronic marketplace purchases the use of a sign which is identical to a registered trade mark as a keyword from a search engine operator so that the sign is displayed to a user by the search engine in a sponsored link to the website of the operator of the electronic marketplace, the display of the sign in the sponsored link constitutes ‘use’ of the sign within the meaning of Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 89/104 and Article 9(1)(a) of Regulation No 40/94.
Cierra el culoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Where a trader which operates an online marketplace purchases the use of a sign which is identical to a registered trade mark as a keyword from a search engine operator so that the sign is displayed to a user by the search engine in a sponsored link to the website of the operator of the online marketplace, does the display of the sign in the sponsored link constitute ‘use’ of the sign within the meaning of Article 5(l)(a) of the Trade Marks Directive and Article 9(l)(a) of the CTM Regulation?
Tengo que volverEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(5) Where a trader which operates an online marketplace purchases the use of a sign which is identical to a registered trade mark as a keyword from a search engine operator so that the sign is displayed to a user by the search engine in a sponsored link to the website of the operator of the online marketplace, does the display of the sign in the sponsored link constitute “use” of the sign within the meaning of Article 5(1)(a) of [Directive 89/104] and Article 9(1)(a) of [Regulation No 40/94]?
No estoy enojado contigo, ¿ lo sabes?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
(5) Where a trader which operates an online marketplace purchases the use of a sign which is identical to a registered trade mark as a keyword from a search engine operator so that the sign is displayed to a user by the search engine in a sponsored link to the website of the operator of the online marketplace, does the display of the sign in the sponsored link constitute “use” of the sign within the meaning of Article 5(1)(a) of [Directive 89/104] and Article 9(1)(a) of [Regulation No 40/94]?
Hace tan sólo una hora, estábamos muy enfadados por esoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
67 By contrast, in the case provided for in Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 89/104, the third-party user of a sign identical with, or similar to, a registered mark does not assert any trade mark rights over that sign but is using it on an ad hoc basis.
Van Meer no está muertoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
By contrast, in the case provided for in Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 89/104, the third-party user of a sign identical with, or similar to, a registered mark does not assert any trade mark rights over that sign but is using it on an ad hoc basis.
Clay, no volvíEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Accordingly, the Court held that, ‘in cases where intermediaries participate in the distribution to the consumer or the end user of a product which is the subject of a registered trade mark, the relevant classes of persons whose views fall to be taken into account in determining whether that trade mark has become the common name in the trade for the product in question comprise all consumers and end users and, depending on the features of the market concerned, all those in the trade who deal with that product commercially’.
Ella era su caseraEurLex-2 EurLex-2
whether the advertiser is in fact offering goods or services which are identical to the goods or services covered by the registered trade mark on a webpage of his own, which internet users (as referred to in Question #(a)) can access via a hyperlink in the reference on the search engine provider's webpage?
Y nada purifica como el fuegooj4 oj4
whether the advertiser is in fact offering goods or services which are identical to the goods or services covered by the registered trade mark on a webpage of his own, which internet users (as referred to in Question 1(a)) can access via a hyperlink in the reference on the search engine provider's webpage?
¿ Por qué me vas a dar un beso?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
‘1. (a) Where a trader in certain goods or services (“the advertiser”) avails himself of the possibility of submitting to the provider of an internet search engine [a keyword] ... which is identical to a trade mark registered by another person (“the proprietor”) in respect of similar goods or services, and the [keyword] submitted – without this being visible to the search engine user – results in the internet user who enters that word finding a reference to the advertiser’s website in the search engine provider’s list of search results, is the advertiser “using” the registered trade mark within the meaning of Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 89/104 ...?
No obstante, y atendiendo meramente a consideraciones de índole cuantitativa, se produce una duplicación en el número de comités con relación a los ya existentes, dando lugar a un elenco comitológicoque se incrementa aún más con la inclusión del Comité de Servicios Financieros, instituido unos meses antes de los mencionados comités y cuyas funciones parecen solaparse a priori con las de estosEurLex-2 EurLex-2
30 It follows from all of the foregoing considerations that the answer to the first question referred is that Article 12(2)(a) of Directive 2008/95 must be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that at issue in the main proceedings, a trade mark is liable to revocation in respect of a product for which it is registered if, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, that trade mark has become the common name for that product from the point of view solely of end users of the product.
Todos tienen un límiteEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In the light of all the foregoing, the answer to the first question must be that Article 12(2)(a) of the Directive must be interpreted as meaning that the relevant class of persons for assessing the question whether a trade mark has become the common name in the trade for the product in respect of which it was registered consists primarily of consumers and end users.
Están en la cola para un viaje expreso hacia el vacíoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
14 Under point 2 of the first subparagraph of Paragraph 8 of Chapter 2 of the Law of 2010, a trade mark is not to be registered if it is similar to an earlier trade mark and the goods or services designated by the two marks are identical or similar, where there exists a likelihood of confusion, including the likelihood of an impression that there is an association between the user of the trade mark and the proprietor of the registered trade mark.
Si alguna vez dice una sola palabra de estoEurlex2019 Eurlex2019
– Article 12(2)(a) of Directive 2008/95/EC must be interpreted as meaning that the relevant class of persons for assessing the question whether a trade mark has become the common name in the trade for the product in respect of which it was registered consists primarily of consumers and end users.
Pensó que yo podía hacerlo.- ¿ Ya no eres enfermera?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Article 12(2)(a) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that at issue in the main proceedings, a trade mark is liable to revocation in respect of a product for which it is registered if, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, that trade mark has become the common name for that product from the point of view solely of end users of the product.
Perdón, ¿ alguno de ustedes recuerda un tema deEurLex-2 EurLex-2
1. Article 12(2)(a) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that at issue in the main proceedings, a trade mark is liable to revocation in respect of a product for which it is registered if, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, that trade mark has become the common name for that product from the point of view solely of end users of the product.
Vaya un luchador que estás hechoEurLex-2 EurLex-2
62 sinne gevind in 27 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.