(53) - The Court has, for example, consequent upon its judgment in Joined Cases C-320/90, C-321/90 and C-322/90 Telemarsicabruzzo v Circostel and Others [1993] ECR I-393, where it ruled that `the need to provide an interpretation of Community law which will be of use to the national court makes it necessary that the national court define the factual and legislative context of the questions it is asking or, at the very least, explain the factual circumstances on which those questions are based' (paragraph 6 of the judgment), adopted a number of orders in which it has declined to answer questions referred where those conditions are not met; see, inter alia, Case C-101/96 Italia Testa [1996] ECR I-0000.
Según reiterada jurisprudencia, esta disposición prohíbe todas las medidas, que reserven a los movimientos transfronterizos de capitales un trato menos favorable que el establecido para los movimientos de capitales exclusivamente nacionales disuadiendo así a los residentes de realizar los primerosEurLex-2 EurLex-2