ALROSA oor Fins
ALROSA
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Fins
ALROSA
Alrosa objects that in its decision the Commission did not actually oppose abusive behaviour, but manifestly lawful behaviour.
Alrosa väittää, että komissio ei vastusta päätöksellään väärinkäyttöä vaan ilmeisen lainmukaista käyttäytymistä.
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
187 In the circumstances of the present case, the close connection between the two sets of proceedings initiated by the Commission and the fact that the Decision expressly refers to Alrosa should have led to the applicant being accorded, as regards the proceedings taken as a whole, the rights given to an ‘undertaking concerned’ within the meaning of Regulation No 1/2003, although, strictly speaking, it did not fall to be so classified in the proceedings relating to Article 82 EC.
Yrität liikaaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In total Alrosa is developing 27 fields.
Tule tänne nytWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
(157) This historical context also distinguishes the situation of Alrosa from that of other producers on the market.
Olet aika kusipääEurLex-2 EurLex-2
d) The scope of Alrosa’s right to be heard (third part of the second ground of appeal)
Kello kolme?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
88 It must be observed here that in the present case two sets of proceedings were started by the Commission, one under Article 81 EC concerning the conduct of De Beers and Alrosa on the market in rough diamonds, and the other under Article 82 EC concerning the unilateral practices of De Beers.
ovat kuulleet alueiden komiteaaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
At the same time, Alrosa received a summary of the third-party observations and was informed of the nature of the commitments which the Commission expected the parties to give following the negative result of the consultation with third parties: cessation of all relations with effect from 2009 and a new offer of commitments, on that basis, before the end of November 2005.
Toisella puoliskolla haastattelussamme on Dermot MulroneyEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(149) I will therefore base the following considerations on the Commission’s findings on the results of the market test, which Alrosa did not challenge in good time before a court.
He kaikki haluavat samaaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In those two sets of proceedings, separate statements of objections were addressed to De Beers and Alrosa.
Kenraali, älkääEurLex-2 EurLex-2
All in all, it must therefore be concluded that even knowledge of the joint commitments by De Beers and Alrosa could not prevent the Commission from making binding the further-reaching unilateral commitments by De Beers.
Jokin menneisyydestä haluaa tappaa minut viattomastiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The effectiveness of the commitments proposed by De Beers and ALROSA in addressing the Commission's concerns was not fully confirmed
Käsittäkseni sinustakin on tullut aika hyvä pilottioj4 oj4
Consequently, the fact that Alrosa proposed a number of commitments in September 2003 has no effect on the lawfulness of the Decision.
Käskin tulla lähemmäsEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Alrosa takes the view that this second ground of appeal raised by the Commission is nugatory because it is directed at statements in the contested judgment which the Court of First Instance made only for the sake of completeness.
Se on tärkein tehtävämmeEurLex-2 EurLex-2
39 See, in that regard, the Opinions of Advocate General Kokott in Commission v Alrosa (C‐441/07 P, EU:C:2009:555, point 146) and of Advocate General Wahl in Total v Commission (C‐597/13 P, EU:C:2015:207, points 58 and 59).
Arvasin tämän senkin perverssi!eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 eurlex-diff-2018-06-20
(1) set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 July 2007 in Case T-170/06 Alrosa v Commission;
Katsotaan, onko sinulla sisuaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
80 Even if account were taken of an alleged close connection between the proceedings under Articles 81 EC and 82 EC, or even if only a ‘single set of proceedings’ existed, that would not suffice to enlarge the extent of the procedural rights accorded to Alrosa.
Käännös oikealleEurLex-2 EurLex-2
These joint commitments provided for a progressive reduction in sales of rough diamonds by Alrosa to De Beers, the value of which was to go down from USD 700 million in 2005 to USD 275 million in 2010, and subsequently to be capped at that level.
Mikä sitten tuli?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
The Court of First Instance simply stated in the present case that, if the auctions proposed by Alrosa were implemented, there was no risk of abuse on the part of the seller in connection with the acceptance of bids.
Hoidan sen asianEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(137) This was also acknowledged by Alrosa in response to queries at the hearing before the Court of Justice.
Se ilmoitti komissiolle lokakuussa # katsovansa, että haettu käytön laajentaminen ei aiheuta mitään uusia riskejä niiden riskien lisäksi, jotka on jo otettu huomioon direktiivin #/#/ETY liitteessä I olevissa metkonatsolia koskevissa erityissäännöksissäja kyseistä ainetta käsittelevässä komission tarkastelukertomuksessaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
95 It follows from the foregoing that the second ground of appeal is also well founded in that, first, the General Court misinterpreted the concept of ‘undertaking concerned’ within the meaning of Regulation No 1/2003 by comparing the legal position of Alrosa in the proceedings relating to the individual commitments with that of De Beers and, second, the General Court based its reasoning on the incorrect proposition that the Commission was required to give reasons for rejecting the joint commitments and to suggest to Alrosa that it offer new joint commitments with De Beers.
Kyllä, mutten näinEurLex-2 EurLex-2
On the other hand, that article is based on considerations of procedural economy, since the Commission is not required to demonstrate to the requisite legal standard that the conditions of Article 101 TFEU or Article 102 TFEU are satisfied and is therefore able to provide a more rapid solution to the problems which it has identified (see, to that effect, Commission v Alrosa, paragraph 54 above, paragraph 35).
Kävin tapaamassa vaimoani ja poikaani tänäänEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Since the Commission has not established that criteria other than the value of the offer to purchase were taken into account by Alrosa in the case of sales actually made at auction, the argument based on the preferential treatment which De Beers would have enjoyed at such sales cannot be accepted.
Minulla ei ole mitään hihoissaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The amount of USD 800 million, established in accordance with the prices in force on the date on which the notified agreement was entered into, accounted for around one half of Alrosa’s annual production and for the entire production exported outside the Community of Independent States (CIS).
Hän on juna- asemallaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
83 Alrosa submits that the General Court could have rejected the Commission’s argument solely on the ground that the contested decision leading to a permanent prohibition of all sales of diamonds to De Beers required Alrosa to enjoy all the rights granted to an addressee of such a decision.
Minulta meni vain kahdeksan vuotta päästä everstiksiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
32 Alrosa argues that the General Court did not limit the Commission’s powers under Article 9 of Regulation No 1/2003.
Tervetuloa hupitaloonEurLex-2 EurLex-2
The Commission submits that Alrosa therefore fully enjoyed the right to be heard.
Kun sain potkut...- Ajattelit että Nicole olisi se henkilö- jonka kanssa voisit jakaa senEurLex-2 EurLex-2
202 sinne gevind in 6 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.