By the first part of their first plea, the main appellants take issue with the General Court for having disregarded the legal test applicable to the examination of the objective necessity of an ancillary restriction, as defined, in particular, in the judgments of this Court in DLG (68) and of the General Court in M6 and Others v Commission.
Esimerkiksi tieliikenteen ajoneuvojen vienti on vähentynyt 51,3 prosenttia ja autojen vienti 59,4 prosenttia.EurLex-2 EurLex-2