Sturgeon's Law oor Fins
Sturgeon's Law
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Fins
Sturgeonin laki
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
Sturgeon's law
en
The humorous remark, attributed to science-fiction author Theodore Sturgeon, that "ninety percent of everything is crap".
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Fins
Geen vertalings nie
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
Sturgeon's law: "Ninety percent of everything is crud."
Vasta-aiheetWikiMatrix WikiMatrix
17 The Sturgeons then appealed on a point of law (‘Revision’) to the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice).
Painu helvettiinEurLex-2 EurLex-2
LIFE is providing EUR 1.1 million for the ‘LIFE for Danube Sturgeons 12 ’ project (2016-2020), which aims to improve enforcement of laws and regulations against sturgeon poaching and illegal caviar trade in Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia and Ukraine.
Jokainen ansaitsee tämänEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4
51 Likewise, the Court held that, where a provision of EU law is open to several interpretations, preference must be given to the interpretation which ensures that the provision retains its effectiveness (see Sturgeon and Others, paragraph 47 and the case-law cited).
Tällä pyritään suojelemaan sisäisen tarkastajan ja tarkastettavan välistä suhdetta, jota sisäisen tarkastuksen onnistuminen edellyttääEurLex-2 EurLex-2
50 In that sense, the enacting terms of an EU act are indissociably linked to the reasons given for it, so that, when it has to be interpreted, account must be taken of the reasons which led to its adoption (Case C‐298/00 P Italy v Commission [2004] ECR I‐4087, paragraph 97 and the case-law cited, and Sturgeon and Others, paragraph 42).
Arvoisa puhemies, olette varmaankin samaa mieltä, että poliitikkojen yhtenä tehtävänä on näyttää esimerkkiä.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
33 In that regard, it should be noted that the principle of equal treatment requires that comparable situations must not be treated differently and that different situations must not be treated in the same way unless such treatment is objectively justified (Sturgeon and Others, paragraph 48 and the case-law cited).
Paljon paremmin, jos saat minulle siirronEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Whereas the laws of certain Member States still authorize the use of boric acid and sodium tetraborate (borax) in caviar (sturgeon eggs) and egg products and also of formaldehyde in "Grana padano" cheese under certain conditions, and whereas such laws are based on particular circumstances and a transitional period should be provided for so that the necessary adjustments may be made;
Ajattelinkin niinEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Such compensation may accordingly reduce or even remove the financial burden borne by carriers in consequence of those obligations (judgment in Sturgeon and Others, C‐402/07 and C‐432/07, EU:C:2009:716, paragraph 68 and the case-law cited).
Hei, katsohan tätä.Aivan kuin olisimme muuttuneet rutiköyhistä miljonääreiksiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Having regard to the fact that as the result of a case-law construct (judgment of 19 November 2009, Sturgeon, C-402/07 and C-432/07, EU:C:2009:716) the right to compensation that Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of 11 February 2004 (1) establishes for denied boarding or cancellation was extended to include delayed flights, does the express condition that passengers must present themselves for check-in laid down in Article 3(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of 11 February 2004, which applies only in the case of denied boarding, apply in the context of compensation claimed by a passenger who has not been denied boarding but whose flight has been delayed?
Te ette ymmärräEurlex2019 Eurlex2019
108 On the contrary, as both the applicant and the Commission itself submit in essence, all acts of the European Union must be interpreted in accordance with primary law as a whole, including the principle of equal treatment (judgments of 19 November 2009 in Sturgeon and Others, C‐402/07 and C‐432/07, ECR, EU:C:2009:716, paragraph 48, and of 16 September 2010 in Chatzi, C‐149/10, ECR, EU:C:2010:534, paragraph 43).
Mutta tulen kohta takaisin ja tapaan sitten ystäväsiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
22 The Bundesgerichtshof takes the view that Mrs Folkerts is entitled to compensation in the amount of EUR 600 only if the case-law of the Court of Justice (Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon and Others [2009] ECR I-10923) – according to which passengers have the right to compensation under Article 7(1) of Regulation No 261/2004 also in the event of long delay – is also applicable to cases where, although there was not yet any delay beyond the scheduled departure within the terms of Article 6(1) of that regulation, the final destination was nonetheless reached three hours or more after the arrival time originally scheduled.
Kolmannes Yhdistyneiden Kansakuntien jäsenvaltioista on Euroopan ja Latinalaisen Amerikan maita.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
43 In addition, under a general principle of interpretation, a Community measure must be interpreted, as far as possible, in such a way as not to affect its validity and in conformity with primary law as a whole (see, in particular, Case C-361/06 Feinchemie Schwebda and Bayer CropScience [2008] ECR I‐3865, paragraphs 49 and 50, and Sturgeon and Others, paragraphs 47 and 48), including with the principle of equal treatment.
Olen pakoillani, LouisEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Having regard to the fact that as the result of a case-law construct (judgment of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of Justice of 19 November 2009, Sturgeon, C-402/07 and C-432/07, EU:C:2009:716), the right to compensation that Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 (1) establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 establishes for denied boarding or cancellation was extended to include delayed flights, does the express condition that passengers must present themselves for check-in laid down in Article 3(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, which applies only in the case of denied boarding, apply in the context of compensation claimed by a passenger who has not been denied boarding but whose flight has been delayed?
Ja tupakkaaEurlex2019 Eurlex2019
29 In that regard, all acts of EU law, such as Regulation No 261/2004, must be interpreted, according to the Court’s case-law, in accordance with primary law as a whole, including the principle of equal treatment, which requires that comparable situations must not be treated differently and that different situations must not be treated in the same way unless such treatment is objectively justified (see, inter alia, judgment of 19 November 2009, Sturgeon and Others, C‐402/07 and C‐432/07, EU:C:2009:716, paragraph 48).
Se ei mennyt läheskään suunnitelmien mukaanEuroParl2021 EuroParl2021
49 Accordingly, given, first, that the requirement to interpret secondary legislation in compliance with primary law follows from the general principle of interpretation that a provision must be interpreted, as far as possible, in such a way as not to affect its validity (see, to that effect, judgments in Sturgeon and Others, C‐402/07 and C‐432/07, EU:C:2009:716, paragraphs 47 and 48, and review of Commission v Strack, C‐579/12 RX-II, EU:C:2013:570, paragraph 40), and, second, that the legality of Article 8(3) of Decision 2005/387 must be assessed, for the reasons set out in paragraph 45 above, in particular in the light of Article 39(1) EU, the former provision must be interpreted in a manner consistent with the latter.
Muita ehdotuksia?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
39 Accordingly, given, first, that the requirement to interpret secondary legislation in such a way that it complies with primary law follows from the general principle of interpretation that a provision must be interpreted, as far as possible, in such a way as not to affect its validity (see, to that effect, judgments in Sturgeon and Others, C‐402/07 and C‐432/07, EU:C:2009:716, paragraphs 47 and 48, and review of Commission v Strack, C‐579/12 RX-II, EU:C:2013:570, paragraph 40), and, second, that the legality of Article 18(2) of Decision 2008/633 must be assessed, for the reasons set out in paragraph 35 above, in particular in the light of Article 39(1) EU, the former provision must be interpreted in a manner consistent with the latter.
Niiden on ilmoitettava tästä komissiolle viipymättäEurLex-2 EurLex-2
18 sinne gevind in 10 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.