hackle
Penacho · häkilä · häkilöidä · häkilöin · kammata häkilällä · niskakarvat · niskasulat · riivinrauta
hackles oor Fins
hackles
en
Plural form of hackle.
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Fins
kiukku
ärtymys
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
Soortgelyke frases
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
In Case C-#/#: Italian Republic (Agents: U. Leanza, I. Braguglia assisted by P.G. Ferri and M. Fiorilli) v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. De Persio, D. Triantafyllou and V. Di Bucci)- Action for annulment under Article # EC, brought on # October #- the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans and A. Rosas, Presidents of Chambers, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr and J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on # May #, in which it
Joko he lähtivät?- Kyllä. He lähtivät Charlesin mukana Lontooseenoj4 oj4
Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl delivered on 17 February 2005
Vien sinut pois täältäEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Looks like the hackles of a wild cat.
Syntymäpaikka: Sfax, TunisiaOpenSubtitles2018.v3 OpenSubtitles2018.v3
In Case C-#/#: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article # EC from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division), made by decision of # May #, received at the Court on # May #, in the proceedings between The British Horseracing Board Ltd and Others and William Hill Organization Ltd- the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas and K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), (Presidents of Chambers), J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, N. Colneric and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi and M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrators, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on # November #, in which it has ruled
Muutin mieltänioj4 oj4
Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; K.
OnnittelutEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In Case C-#/#: reference to the Court under Article # EC by the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Supreme Administrative Court) (Finland) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court brought by Marie Lindfors- on the interpretation of Article # of Council Directive #/#/EEC of # March # on tax exemptions applicable to permanent imports from a Member State of the personal property of individuals (OJ # L #, p. #),- the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, S. von Bahr, R. Silva de Lapuerta and K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar, gave a judgment on # July #, the operative part of which is as follows
Pelkään pojan olevan raunioissaoj4 oj4
14 – Opinion of Advocate General Stix Hackl in Lindfors, not yet published in ECR, point 39.
Tällä alalla vallitsee suuri vapaus ja valtava kilpailu, joka tosin antaa erinomaisen pohjan dynaamisuudelle mutta johtaa myös matalampien kustannusten tavoitteluun "hinnalla millä hyvänsä", oli kyse sitten koneista, materiaaleista tai ihmisistä.EurLex-2 EurLex-2
In Case C-#/# Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Simonsson and W. Wils) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: M. Wimmer)- ACTION for a declaration of failure to fulfil obligations pursuant to Article # EC, brought on # March #– the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of J. Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta and J. Klučka (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on # December #, in which it
Voitko lopettaa?oj4 oj4
Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl delivered on 11 November 2004
En taatustiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl delivered on 13 July 2004
Onko jokin hullusti?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Stix-Hackl, acting as Agent,
Minä olen vaimosiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Stix-Hackl, Advocate General, K.
Repeämiä on syntynyt USA:N ylleEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In her Opinion in Parliament v Council of 13 December 2001, Advocate General Stix‐Hackl replied in the affirmative, taking the view, without however giving any further explanation, that a secondary legal basis ‘is, in principle, permissible provided that certain requirements are fulfilled’.
korostaa, että sekä kansallisten viranomaisten keskenään että kansallisten ja EU:n viranomaisten on toimittava tiiviissä yhteistyössä kansanterveyttä koskevia tietoja vaihtaessaan, jotta voidaan huolehtia säännöstön mahdollisimman hyvästä täytäntöönpanosta ja suojella paremmin EU:n kansalaisia kansainvälisiltä kansanterveydellisiltä hätätilanteiltaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In the view of Advocate General Stix-Hackl, that case-law is to be understood as meaning that it is not sufficient that a measure whose ‘essential characteristic’ is the ‘creation of something new’ has the aim of promoting the internal market.
Lisäksi komissio aikoo esittää vuonna # aloitteen, jonka tavoitteena on hyväksyä puitepäätös, jolla vahvistetaan rikosoikeudellista suojaa väärentämisen torjumiseksiEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In Case C-#/#: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article # EC, by the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany), made by decision of # June #, received at the Court on # November #, in the proceedings between Gerard Merida and Bundesrepublik Deutschland- the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on # September #, in which it has ruled
Poliitikot toistavat samaa asiaa uudelleen ja uudelleenoj4 oj4
Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl delivered on 29November2001. - Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities. - Action for annulment - Clearance of EAGGF accounts - Non-recognition of expenditure - Financial years 1995 to 1997. - Case C-332/00.
Ja jos usko tarkoittaa ettei täysin ymmärrä Jumalan suunnitelmaa,- ehkä ymmärtäminen on vain osa sitä, meidän osamme,- on omistaa sieluEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In Case C-#/#: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article # EC from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal), made by decision of # November #, received at the Court on # December #, in the proceedings between António Jorge Lda and Fazenda Pública- the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), J. Makarczyk, P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on # May #, the operative part of which is as follows
Mitä tapahtui?oj4 oj4
(24) That reasoning is also upheld in the Opinions delivered in those two cases by Advocate General Stix-Hackl, who states that in the circumstances envisaged by Article 378(1) and (2) of the Implementing Regulation – in other words, where the consignment has not been presented at the office of destination in good time – a ‘statutory presumption’ arises concerning the creation of a customs debt and the principal’s identity as debtor.
Jos unohdat RotaTeq: in antokäynninEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Directive 2000/13 has subsequently been interpreted on that basis (see, for example, point 53 of the Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl in Case C‐315/05 Lidl Italia [2006] ECR I‐11181).
Olet hävinnytEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In her Opinion in that case, Advocate General Stix-Hackl similarly suggested that the words ‘by any means or in any form’ implied that the Community legislature gave the term ‘extraction’ a wide meaning, adding that ‘it thus covers not only the transfer to a data medium of the same type but also to one of another type.
Hän sanoi että kaksi SAS: in miestäEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In Case C-#/#: reference for a preliminary ruling under Articles # EC and # EC from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands), made by decision of # October #, received at the Court on # October #, in the proceedings between Götz Leffler and Berlin Chemie AG- the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas (Rapporteur) and J. Malenovský, Presidents of Chambers, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, A. Borg Barthet and M. Ilešič, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on # November #, the operative part of which is as follows
We got a no- showoj4 oj4
Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M.-F.
Kenelle soitin?EurLex-2 EurLex-2
Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; M.
Katherine, tämä paikka tarvitsee sinuaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
In Case C-#/#: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Grunwald and H. Støvlbaek), with an address for service in Luxembourg, v Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-D. Plessing and M. Lumma) – application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive #/#/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of # June # concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas (OJ # L #, p. #), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive – the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), and N. Colneric, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given judgment on # April #, in which it
Vielä yksi juttuoj4 oj4
Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R.
He ovat vasta lapsiaEurLex-2 EurLex-2
202 sinne gevind in 9 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.