reply to third party defence oor Frans
reply to third party defence
Vertalings in die woordeboek Engels - Frans
réplique d'une mise en cause
réponse à la défense d'une mise en cause
réponse à la défense d'une tierce partie
Geskatte vertalings
Vertoon algoritmies gegenereerde vertalings
voorbeelde
Advanced filtering
Voorbeelde moet herlaai word.
FORM 171K Rule 171 REPLY TO THIRD PARTY DEFENCE (General Heading — Use Form 66, with style of cause in accordance with Form 171I) REPLY TO THIRD PARTY DEFENCE 1.
Que vous n' avez rien, médicalementGiga-fren Giga-fren
27B Counterclaim (Against Plaintiff and Person not Already Party to Reply to Third Party Defence
adapter l'annexe I compte tenu du progrès techniqueParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
(4) In a third party claim, pleadings shall consist of the third party claim (Form 29A), third party defence (Form 29B) and reply to third party defence (Form 29C), if any.
Tu veux dormir?ParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
25.01(4) In a third party claim, pleadings shall consist of the third party claim (Form 29A), third party defence (Form 29B) and reply to third party defence (Form 29C), if any.
On va être...- Cinq minutes en retardParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
reply and defence to counterclaim, 171(b), 192(2) form, 171(a) time for service, 205 to respondent's record on notice of motion, 369(3) to third party defence, 171(c)
T'as déjà remarqué le nombre de chats dans cette maison?Giga-fren Giga-fren
(Set out in separate, consecutively numbered paragraphs each allegation of material fact relied on by way of reply to the third party defence.)
Je... je me sens bienParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
So far as concerns the replies to requests for information addressed by the Commission to third parties, the Court has already held that, in the present case, the Commission did not infringe the rights of the defence by providing only non-confidential summaries of some of those replies (see paragraphs 69 to 72 above).
Dispositions généralesEurLex-2 EurLex-2
101 In his reply, the applicant submits that the arguments raised by the Council in its defence regarding the fact that the Monetary Committee is a third party are an expression of a refusal to apply Decision 93/731 and are unfounded, since the conditions for the application of Article 2(2) of that decision – concerning the authorship rule – are not met in the present case.
Je me suis battu contre ce déploiementEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Having regard to the requirements of the rights of the defence, the arguments of the notifying parties submitted in reply to the statement of objections cannot be subject to more demanding standards as to their probative value and their cogency than those imposed in relation to the arguments of competitors, customers and other third parties questioned by the Commission in the course of the administrative procedure or in the light of information provided by the notifying undertakings at a previous stage of the Commission’s investigation.
Les instructions suivantes expliquent comment vous auto-injecter ViraferonPegEurLex-2 EurLex-2
Time for Reply (4) The plaintiff’s reply, if any, to the statement of defence of the third party shall be delivered within ten days after service of that statement of defence.
La contribution est recouvrée par APETRA sur base des données par société pétrolière enregistrée qu'elle reçoit de la Direction généraleParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
29.05(4) The plaintiff's reply, if any, to the statement of defence of the third party shall be filed and served within 10 days after service of that statement of defence.
L'UE sera mieux à même de faire face grâce aux bonnes infrastructures dont elle dispose et aux objectifs de politique agricole qu'elle a fixés pour garantir la production sur l'ensemble de son territoireParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
665 Third, as regards third-party observations which the Commission disclosed in non-confidential form, in particular Rolls-Royce’s reply to the Commission’s letter of 21 March 2001, UTC’s observations of 24 April 2001 and ILFC’s observations, it must be noted, first of all, that the Commission expressly pointed out in its defence that the oral presentations of Rolls-Royce and UTC (P&W’s parent company) related to those undertakings’ concerns and are thus adverse evidence.
C' est pas le casEurLex-2 EurLex-2
None the less, it remains the case that the Commission must, at the stage of the reply to the statement of objections, if it is not to undermine the rights of defence of the notifying parties, apply the same criteria as those applied for the purposes of the examination of the arguments of third parties or those adopted at an earlier stage of its investigation, while being entitled to draw the appropriate consequences in the event that it should transpire at a very advanced stage of the procedure that the notification concerned does not comply with the requirements of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 447/98.
Content de pouvoir t' aiderEurLex-2 EurLex-2
None the less, it remains the case that the Commission must, at the stage of the reply to the statement of objections, if it is not to undermine the rights of the defence of the notifying parties, apply the same criteria as those applied for the purposes of the examination of the arguments of third parties or those adopted at an earlier stage of its investigation, while being entitled to draw the appropriate consequences in the event that it should transpire at a very advanced stage of the procedure that the notification concerned does not comply with the requirements of Article 3(1) of the Implementing Regulation.
contrôleur (Transport terrestre) au rangEurLex-2 EurLex-2
(2) Third and subsequent party actions shall be issued in the same proceeding as the main action, and pleadings in the main action and third and subsequent party action are closed when a reply has been delivered to the defence to the last subsequent party claim, or the time for delivery of such a reply has expired.
Ça fait trois meurtresParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
(1.1) A third party claim may be issued within 10 days after the plaintiff delivers a reply in the main action to the defendant’s statement of defence. O. Reg. 351/94, s. 2.
C' est un nom débileParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
(b) a defendant by counterclaim, crossclaim or third party claim objects in the statement of defence to the counterclaim, crossclaim or third party claim proceeding under this Rule because the counterclaim, crossclaim or third party claim does not comply with subrule (1), and the defendant does not abandon in the reply to the counterclaim, crossclaim or third party claim the claims or parts of claims that do not comply; or
Alors dites- moi la vraie raisonParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
On 23 March 2004, the Defence filed a “Reply to the Registry Response to the Defence Appeal to the Deputy Registrar’s Decision” in which it claims that the Decision “is irretrievably flawed by his reliance on an invalid reason.”12 The Complainant claims not to have received financial support from any third parties.13 As to the question of assessing the Complainant’s household’s income for the purpose of determining his contribution to his defence costs, the Defence states that this matter has already been settled in earlier litigation and should not be reopened.14
Quelqu' un aurait du Valium?ParaCrawl Corpus ParaCrawl Corpus
18 sinne gevind in 65 ms. Hulle kom uit baie bronne en word nie nagegaan nie.