Thus, in the judgment of 12 November 2014, L (C‐656/13, EU:C:2014:2364, paragraphs 56 and 57), the Court held that the existence of an express or at least unequivocal agreement within the meaning of that provision manifestly cannot be established where the court in question is seised on the initiative of only one of the parties to the proceedings and, later, another party to those proceedings, on taking the first step required of him in the first proceedings, pleads the lack of jurisdiction of the court seised.
Bio sam liječnik u denobulanskome pješaštvuEurlex2018q4 Eurlex2018q4